[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: _[ukha_d]_NOT_A_Bargain]_Kodak_3.1_Mp_camera_for_£100
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE:
_[ukha_d]_NOT_A_Bargain]_Kodak_3.1_Mp_camera_for_£100
- From: "Des Gibbons" <des@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 00:52:12 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I have got my 'Bog off' email now, if anyone is thinking of doing
something,
I'll put my name down, just so they can't wriggle out of it :)
My fag packet calculation estimates there is £200,000 involved. Does anyone
think less than 1000 orders were placed?
Des
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl Moore [mailto:karl@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 00:41
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: _[ukha_d]_NOT_A_Bargain]_Kodak_3.1_Mp_camera_for_£100
Not received my "bog off" e-mail yet - but certainly would be
interested in
moving further legally with this.
I'm in a precedent-setting mood :)
KM
-----Original Message-----
From: simon rafferty [mailto:musashi1977uk@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 11:48 PM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re:_[ukha_d]_NOT_A_Bargain]_Kodak_3.1_Mp_camera_for_£100
In light of Kodak's current statement I wonder whether there enough people
on the HA groups to form a Class Action against Kodak ??
Simon Rafferty
RobertCrawshaw <robert@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for £100
Mmm, who's up for a bit of Kodak bashing if needs be then? ;-)
ME!!!
Cos i got my order confirmation email too
Im in the same boat as someone else on here
This mailing list is costing me a damned fortune :O)))))))))
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|