[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: ukha'ers
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: ukha'ers
- From: "Matthew Keay" <m@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 17:10:28 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
In most cases you'd get more info from that persons domain name details,
etc... hehe.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stainton-James, Mark (London) [mailto:stainmar@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 07 January 2002 16:57
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ukha'ers
Daniel,
Only if the post code is attached to a name, and made publicly available in
that format. Just saying 3 people in the TN12 area for example really
doesn't give much away, if the information is mapped graphically as Mark
suggests then it actually would probably show even less information.
-----Original Message-----
From: James, Daniel [mailto:daniel.james@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 07 January 2002 16:44
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ukha'ers
I take it you haven't visited 192.com...........
That gives away enough to find you :-)
Daniel
---
Matthew Keay
m@xxxxxxx
07789 510448
Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares?
---
This mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.313 / Virus Database: 174 - Release Date: 02/01/2002
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|