The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Very sensitive PIR's or DualTech?


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Very sensitive PIR's or DualTech?
  • From: "PatrickLidstone" <patrickl@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:15:41 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

--- In ukha_d@y..., "psghome2002" <psghome@h...> wrote:
> My question is - has anyone found a suitable PIR for this task i.e.
> triggers really quickly (without too many false detections) and
> looks good on the wall?

Yes - you can buy just the active part of the PIR from
Maplins/Farnell. Measures about 1" square, with a domed plastic
bubble, costs about a fiver, outputs 5V logic. Without any kind of
fresnell (sp?) lens, they are super sensitive to movement. In
security applications, the sensor would have a "double strike"
action
added to minimise false alarms (and NO/NC contacts + anti-tamper)
circuits added in addition to the lens. I imagine you don't care too
much about false triggers if you are just controlling lights -
sunlight may be a problem in your pad! Alternatively, look to
position overhead pointing down to detect heads.

Seems to me there is a scope for a "super PIR" which includes:
security PIR, occupancy PIR, camera (ok I know you can get these
already), dallas temp sensing, possibly light sensing, bi-directional
IR and perhaps a minature speaker for announcements. With the
possible exception of the speaker it should all fit in a conventional
PIR housing with no problem. The non-security bits could then be
multiplexed to save cable...

Patrick





Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.