The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home

Group Home

Search Archive
Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: Fiinding an HA- compliant SWMBO

To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Re: Fiinding an HA- compliant SWMBO
From: "Andy Powell" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 19:22:40 +0100
Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
References: <61B5B688553BD211842E0008C7A481070A2CB34F@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

On 13/02/02 at 17:19 BUTLER, Tony, FM wrote:

>Fair nuff, I was thing of the other useful interfaces and functions
found
>in
>a standard SWMBO,
>From a HA PoV you are of course correct about it being merely a matter
of
>symbolic notation :)
>

Ahhh yes.. the expansion buffers etc... hadn't included that.. but I was
concentrating on the HA aspect

Andy

--- Tag-it! v2.0 (c) Andy Powell 1998

The trouble with getting a life is making the payments.

References:
- RE: Re: Fiinding an HA- compliant SWMBO
  - From: "BUTLER, Tony, FM" <tony.butler@xxxxxxx>

Prev by Date: RE: Door Bells anyone?
Next by Date: RE: Triple and Earth for LD11 WAS Re: OT: ISP questions + on topic PS
Previous by thread: RE: Re: Fiinding an HA- compliant SWMBO
Next by thread: RE: Re: Fiinding an HA- compliant SWMBO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.