RE: Re: Fiinding an HA- compliant SWMBO

["BUTLER, Tony, FM" <tony.butler@xxxxxxx>]

Fair nuff, I was thing of the other useful interfaces and functions found
in
a standard SWMBO,
>from
symbolic notation :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: andy_powell_is [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 13 February 2002 16:57
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Fiinding an HA- compliant SWMBO
>
>
> Tony,
>
> I would disagree with the 'gayness' factor it is merely a notational
> update that is required. There are no predefined genetic requirements
> for the Obeyee and there are none for the obeyer.
>
> Thus it is simply a case of removing the preceeding denoting
> character and substituting it for a more appropriate one. Once this
> has been performed then the compliance factors and calculations used
> are the same.
>
> HTH
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> --- In ukha_d@y..., "BUTLER, Tony, FM"
<tony.butler@r...> wrote:
> > Sadly, (no offence intended to anyone out there), it would also
mean
> > incorporating the 'being gay' algorithm, wihch is a calculation
too
> far in
> > my case I'm afraid :-O
> >
> > Tony
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>


********************************************************************
Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com

This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
********************************************************************