|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: Speakers and mains cable |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: am12 vs. tm13 x10 appliance modules
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: am12 vs. tm13 x10 appliance modules
- From: "K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 13:08:48 +0000 (GMT)
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, Stephen wrote:
> Thanks for your opinions. When you say the TM13 is unreliable, what
do
> you mean: unreliable regarding rf reception, or are there other
> issues?
Judging by the number of returns we have and the reasons for their
return,
both the RF and built-in appliance module sections have contributed
equally to the failures. X-10 went through a similar failure curve when
the TM12 was introduced but they have managed to resolve the problems.
One
would have thought that X-10 have learnt the lesson so as not to repeat
it
again. Evidence has suggested otherwise.
> I didn't realise the tm13 could only switch 5 amps which may be an
> important consideration.
The relay used in the TM13 is different from the TM12. In fact, the
TM13
is a completely new design to the TM12 both physically and
electronically.
> My, isn't the am12 noisy!
Yes. It is one of the bad points of that relay. The good point is that
it
is latching - it will remain in the last state even when mains power is
disconnected.
Regards,
Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx
Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|