The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: OT: Domain Names LEGAL Stuff


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: OT: Domain Names LEGAL Stuff
  • From: "Amar Nagi" <amar@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 11:08:56 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I will rephrase that :-)

i have looked into this b4 and you will find there is not much they can do UNLESS
the name is a trademark name or a household name like argos. They would argue
that you having the name will harm their business.

They are trying the normal bully tatics on you, which i personally would not stand for.
(Sony and Warner Bros Records did this to me over recording contracts and i told them
to spin and they backed off after a while and i won).
They are trying to scare you. It  depends on what you want the
name for ? if you are not fussed then agree a price with them and sell it, you only  stand to gain

      -----Original Message-----
      From: Amar Nagi
      Sent: Fri 09/08/2002 10:54
      To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
      Cc:
      Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT: Domain Names LEGAL Stuff
     
     
      i have looked into this b4 and you will find there is not much they can do IF
      the name is a trademark name or a household name like argos.
      They are trying the bully tatics on you which i personally would not stand for.
      They are trying to scare you.
      It all depends on what you want the name for ? if you are not fussed then
      agree a price with them and sell it, you only  stand to gain

            -----Original Message-----
            From: Nikola Kasic [mailto:nikola@xxxxxxx]
            Sent: Fri 09/08/2002 10:42
            To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
            Cc:
            Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT: Domain Names LEGAL Stuff
           
           
            I would say that I just plan to start business and have web site in development stage with name in question, so redesigning it would cost me a money, and I would ask for £1,000-£2,000 at least. So you can buy something for that money, at least.
            £100 is really nothing, if they really want that name. Solicitor probably charges them £500 a day.
            Cheers,
            Nik

                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
                  Sent: 09 August 2002 10:32
                  To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
                  Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT: Domain Names LEGAL Stuff
                 
                 
                  Having followed a lot of the stories on the Register et al, it sounds very
                  much like you would get spanked into the floor Martin :(
                 
                  Remember .com is *not* a US domain: it's a *global* domain.
                  It's just the US mindset that makes it common for US only companies to use
                  exclusively .com
                 
                  There is a specific .us heirarchy, just as there is a .uk, and post Sept 11,
                  this seems to be really taking off.
                 
                  if you are registered after them, they are trading via the .co.uk and you
                  have not made use of the .com in a non-infringing way, then if it went to
                  domain arbitration, you *WOULD* lose.
                 
                  personally, I would take money and run.
                 
                  Ian.
                 
                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: Martin [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
                  Sent: 08 August 2002 21:53
                  To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
                  Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT: Domain Names LEGAL Stuff
                 
                 
                  OK, Thanks Mark
                 
                  Sounds like the course of action would be to transfer the domain to save
                  any of us getting in the sh_t.
                 
                  The passing off bit might be iffy, the names were redirected initially
                  but are not now. So would they have a case based on this ?
                 
                  There are so many if's ,my names were registered after theirs, maybe a
                  case for passing off ?,  they are dot.com's - a US name after all, ,
                  they do not hold the trademark, and heck so what if I'm not going to use
                  the names just yet.
                 
                  If I transferred the names now would they have a case at all ?
                 
                 
                  hmmm , I may just have to take the dosh and buy a useful HA gadget.
                  Suggestions ?
                 
                  Regards
                  Martin
                 
                 
                 
                 
                 
                  -----Original Message-----
                  From: mark_harrison_uk1 [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
                  Sent: 08 August 2002 20:43
                  To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
                  Subject: [ukha_d] Re: OT: Domain Names LEGAL Stuff
                 
                 
                 
                  Bear in mind that I am NOT a lawyer, and that I am not qualified to
                  give legal advice. However, I am a senior manager with overall
                  responsibility for Domain Name registrations for a FTSE 100 company
                  with significant web presences Europe-wide. The following, however,
                  is my personal opinion, not that of my employer.
                 
                  Firstly, don't get hung up on the fact they use solicitors to do
                  this - several solicitors these days have Intellectual Property
                  practices that include Domain Name protection along with Trademark
                  protection et al. The company may simply (as we do) simply have an
                  outsourcing contract with this firm to do this - the fact they are
                  solicitors is neither here nor there - the fact they are IP
                  Consultants is...
                 
                  Personally, I think that £100 + transfer costs is fair, and my advice
                  would be to take it. If the company is a large, household name, then
                  they might go to £500 + transfer costs, but are very unlikely to go
                  any higher.
                 
                  I feel that, actually, the company has acted reasonably in making you
                  the initial offer. The fact that they have threated legal action has
                  happened only AFTER you have refused to consider this. However, the
                  fact that they have increased their offer suggests that they don't
                  want to make a big deal out of this (but do wish to protect their IP.)
                 
                  As I see it as a laymam, there are a number of issues here. The key
                  issue is that the UK legal system now very much frowns upon
                  Cybersquatting - the deliberate registration of someone elses trading
                  name with no intent to do anything other than sell on the domain name.
                 
                  However, work through the following:
                 
                  1: When did you register the domain names? If you did so BEFORE they
                  launched their business, then you could claim that your intention was
                  to launch a service using that name. However, if you did so AFTER
                  they launced their business, then they could (potentially
                  succesfully - this has happened) argue that you only registered the
                  name as a cybersquat.
                 
                  2: If you have launched any service on the names that might cause
                  confusion, then they would have a case under UK law to proceed
                  against you for "passing off". If, however, there is nothing but a
                  holding page, then you are unlikely to be deemed to have any
                  liability in respect of passing off.
                 
                  3: The fact that the names are .coms rather than .co.uks raises the
                  question of whether the UK courts would have any jurisdiction. You
                  could argue that .com is, according the the standard, intended for
                  use by US Companies, and that the ONLY basis for challenging a
                  registration is that a company has registered a FEDERAL (not State)
                  trademark as the contested name, and that US courts would have
                  jurisdiction.
                 
                  4: What do you intend doing with the domains? If you haven't used
                  them for the last 18 months, and demonstrably had no intention of
                  doing so AND refused a good faith offer, then there IS a chance that
                  the courts could find in their favour, and you'd be stuffed. The fact
                  you posted HERE that you'd never used the domains, and "not bothered
                  about the names" might be used in evidence to demonstrate that you
                  had NOT registered them to set up your own service with that name.
                 
                  5: Do THEY have the name registered as a UK trademark? If not, then I
                  don't think they have a leg to stand on unless you're passing off
                  (see above.)
                 
                  Regards,
                 
                  Mark
                 
                 
                  --- In ukha_d@y..., "Alex Monaghan" <alex@m...> wrote:
                  > I would guess that if you've paid your NIC fees and there's no
                  trademark
                  > infringement, the you can do what you like with your domains.
                  >
                  > If the only justification for legal action is that you've not used
                  them
                  > AND... you do really want the domains, then get a cheapo hosting
                  account and
                  > attach the names to it, put up a simple index.html and their
                  argument is
                  > blown out of the water :-) If you don't have one in mind, look back
                  through
                  > the archives for a post from Chris Bond with a subject of "web
                  hosting
                  > special offer" (or something similar), I transferred my domain on
                  this offer
                  > with no problems.
                  >
                  > > -----Original Message-----
                  > > From: Martin [mailto:ukha@o...]
                  > > Sent: 08 August 2002 17:24
                  > > To: ukha_d@y...
                  > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: Domain Names LEGAL Stuff
                  > >
                  > >
                  > > Hi all
                  > >
                  > > I'm hoping someone can help me out here, I have registered some
                  domain
                  > > names (about 18 months ago, and they are as yet unused). They are
                  dot
                  > > com's.
                  > > A company has approached me who own the dot co.uk with the same
                  name.
                  > > They initially offered a small sum (£50 + transfers costs) via
                  their
                  > > solicitor, I said not interested. Now they are saying that I have
                  not
                  > > used the name and have no right too use it and their final offer
                  is £100
                  > > + transfer or they will take legal action !!!
                  > >
                  > > Heeelllp, should I say stick up your ..... or would it mean a
                  legal
                  > > challenge costing me loads which I may or may not win.
                  > > At the end of the day I'm not that bothered about the name, is it
                  best
                  > > to take what they've offered and just leave it at that ?
                  > >
                  > > Or perhaps I'll transfer the name for someone else to use.....
                  > >
                  > > Cheers
                  > > Martin.
                  > >
                  > >
                  > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
                  <http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
                  > > Post message: ukha_d@y...
                  > > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@y...
                  > > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
                  > > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@y...
                  > >
                  > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
                  http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
                  > >
                 
                 
                 
                  Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
                 
                  ADVERTISEMENT
                 
                  <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=228862.2128520.3581629.1829184/D=egroupweb/S=1705
                  041992:HM/A=1182697/R=0/*http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/990-1736-1039
                  -334>
                 
                  For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
                  <http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
                  Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
                  Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
                  Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
                  List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
                 
                  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
                  <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Service.
                 
                 
                 
                 
                  For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
                  Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
                  Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
                  Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
                  List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
                 
                  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
                 
                 
                 
                 
                  For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
                  Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
                  Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
                  Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
                  List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
                 
                  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .
                 



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.