|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
More SP-DIF Stuff
- To: "UKHA Mailing List" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: More SP-DIF Stuff
- From: "Ian Lowe" <ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:45:42 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
hmm.
An hour or so of google searching, and it seems that 100% of the
problem
with "less than perfect" SP-DIF leads is jitter. Whether caused
by
reflections of the signal (impedance mismatches) or general noise
issues,
jitter is the bad boy.
It can cause subtle changes to the tonal quality of the sound in what
you
would consider a more analog way..
the god news seems to be that any good SP-DIF input should be jitter
corrected, and PC systems are inherently better than "native"
devices like
early Av amps, because the Computer inherently buffers, and therefore
timebase corrects, the SP-DIF stream..
all cool stuff, getting more impressed with SP-DIF the more I see...
:)
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|