The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NOW How About an Exchange Plugin WAS PxAP / Outlook / Prioritisation


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: NOW How About an Exchange Plugin WAS PxAP / Outlook / Prioritisation
  • From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 15:45:55 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Paul,
 
The Outlook plugin was written for two reasons.
 
1: 'Cos it did what I wanted :-)
2: As a proof of concept.
 
I need to make it, not a VBA App in the Outlook context, but a standalone VB app that talks MAPI directly. (So I can support the port listener for "heart beat" compliance.)
 
If that happens, then it becomes a "mini app" that could (for a single user) run on the eMail _server_
 
I don't know if MAPI allows concurrent connections from different apps to the same server as DIFFERENT user context. If it does, then multiple copies of the app, one for each user, could run on the server. (Paul G - do you know this?)
 
M.
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Watkin [mailto:paul_watkin@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 15 August 2002 15:15
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ukha_d] NOW How About an Exchange Plugin WAS PxAP / Outlook / Prioritisation

Sent:  Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:34 PM
I can see how it might be a flag within the Outlook plugin. As such, it's up to the Outlook plugin developer (oh - that's me)
sorry to keep poping out of the woodwork to suggest things for other people to do but I don't have to the necessary skills to write software (this was proven at uni when one project was to do code to control a ped X, if my code had been implemented the death toll would have been horrendous, lol) but could the outlook pulgin be modified to work directly from Exchange or other (preferably exchange tho as I have that :-) ) to notify presence of email in different users accounts.
 
I guess the current model relies on user computer being on 24/7 or at least on when house occupied to work, in my case if I have to go and switch a computer on so the wall can tell SWMBO she has mail I won't win many brownie points but if when SWMBO arrives home she sees a message on the display as she disarm the alarm loads a points.
 
Also in case of an urgent mail is there anything in the protocol to allow the inclusion of say senders name or subject line in the message that appears, I don't know about you guys but I know several people who think if they don't mark it urgent it'll take a week to arrive!
 
Enough of my ramblings, so far this looks really good
 
Regards
 
Paul
 
 


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.