|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: pissed off |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
FW: Widescreen switching signals - followup
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: FW: Widescreen switching signals - followup
- From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 13:21:50 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Guys,
Reply from John which will explain this *way* better than I ever could.
And no-one better bollock me for the attachment as this reply would
make
bugger all sense without it and it's not exactly a bandwidth buster!
K.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Sim [mailto:johnsim@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 23 July 2002 12:23
> To: Kenneth Watt
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Widescreen switching signals - followup
>
> Hi Ken,
>
> yes, looked into this. Line 23 is rather fun!
>
> See attached. Here's what I said to another designer about
this
image:
> The purple
> trace is the difference between the two above it and shows that
there
is
> different aspect ratios.. The lower one is a live
trace. These are
> captured from my DVD player. Look at the ends of the
traces and
you'll
> see
> that the two cyan ones are different from the yellow live trace.
From
> memory, the cyan traces are when the DVD was playing, but yellow
was
just
> the DVD player's basic screen. Essentially, the two cyan
traces have
> copyright indicated.
>
> There would be qutie a bit of circuitry to add this to any product,
or
to
> do
> one standalone. So £120 is expensive, but I can see where
the money
is
> going. Line 23 should be incorporated into the source
device, and
then
> the
> price almost completely disappears.
>
> Also, support is still patchy. Some plasma screens will
react to
this,
> and
> the offset method. Some TVs too. But the best
method at the moment
is
> still SCART. It's very much an emerging
standard. And the killer
> product
> of the future will be to remove it and all copyright information,
but
> they're working on more laws to make it a very big offence to do
so.
>
> I've already found (via a customer) that if you were to take a
D-VHS
> recorder and tape the output from a DVD player via the converter,
you'd be
> able to do this in S-VHS mode, but copy prohibit comes up with
D-VHS.
I
> can only presum that it was Line 23 that was preventing him from
making
> D-VHS copies.
>
> The ultimate solution, or at least my opinion, is to make software
more
> accessable. Virgin, HMV, Tower etc all sell CDs at £14+,
yet I can
go to
> www.cd-wow.com and have them delivered to my door for £9.
And these
are
> brand new CDs, in the top 75. Same is true to a lesser
extent with
DVDs
> via Play.com People will always find a means
to create a back up
for
> friends, but would they have purchased anyway? If not,
nothing has
been
> stolen. Certainly, people do share their
titles. Therefore, I'd
> suggest
> making a more streamlined manufacturing process for CDs/DVD which
is
able
> to
> react quickly to demands of the consumer, and only to make as many
of
a
> title as demand dictates.
>
> All the best,
>
> John.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
line 23 general 01.gif
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|