RE:

["Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>]

Andy,

I'm looking at CENDI from www.centralite.com. Not sure how it would
work
on a standalone basis - I'm looking at putting an entire lighting
system
in - so I may add the IR in as well.

Tim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Bovingdon [mailto:bov@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: 26 April 2002 11:33
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d]

I really want to use my iPaq to control things. I have all my toys in 
one large walk in cupboard with a TV in the living room and a 
projector in the "cinema room". The things that are stopping
me
are: 

Ideally I want a browser without any borders etc - so it looks 
like a full screen remote - anyone know of a PPC browser that
allows this?

I need either an Ocelot, HV or PC IR control system that can
allow for a flood emitters in the back room and either discreet IR
emitters for the projector, TV and PS2 (DVD control) or 2 more
floods for those rooms. I would look to use 802.11 to send the
command to a PC controller. - Any suggestions or comments
on which is best or easiest.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 11:16 AM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d]


> Sorry,
> 
> Should have replied in line. It is really nasty that Philips have
> discontinued the Pronto and replaced it with an inferior product.
The
> only way you can get decent functionality now from a Philips
product
is
> to buy the ridiculously over-priced Pronto-Pro. I've made my views
on
> this pretty plain before. Philips had the opportunity to make
> improvements to the product and haven't, whereas Marantz have. I
know
> they are part of the same group - perhaps that is one reason why I
get
> so hot under the collar about the Philips attitude on ProntoPro
and
Neo.
> 
> I've already decided to jump ship to the Marantz RC-5200, but I'm
sure
I
> won't be the last. That does have extra functionality, but isn't
colour.
> After all who needs a colour remote control?
> 
> The other thing that I'm considering is to use a PocketPC with an
> Ocelot. The only drawback with that is it doesn't have IR for
local
> control :(
> 
> Tim.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 26 April 2002 11:08
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d]
> 
> What's nasty? I don't understand?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 
> 



For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/







For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.