|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: London Meet - Numbers :( |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: MP3 or WMA
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: MP3 or WMA
- From: "tefxp" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 07:40:48 -0000
- Delivered-to: ukha_archive@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
The only thing I played around with really was Playcentre 2 for my
nomad jukebox and I found WMA at 160bps sounded better than MP3 at
256 so I went with WMA - even on a 6 gig portable jukebox, space is
<=
BR>
a premium!
Of course, the a/b listening test was only conducted on a PC =96 I
really need to get my AT hooked up to the stereo and do an A/B
comparison there=85..
Convenience is quite important too, especially when ripping 100's of
CD's, so which ever format I settle for, it'll be a one stop shop,
not running several different programs to achieve the desired result.
At the end of the day though, it's pretty much subjective & what
sounds good to one person may sound kack to someone else=85..
Regards,
Tony Butler
Yahoo! Groups
Spons=
or |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www=
.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|