RE: Cheap projector

["Ian Lowe" <ian@xxxxxxx>]

Mark,

Is there not also a distinction of having sent a confirmation of order?

So, having confirmed, the leqal position moves from offer of sale, to
payment offered, and on to offer accepted?

I doubt projectors FOC was ever a goer, just wondering?

Ian.


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 April 2002 20:07
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Cheap projector


David,

Your understanding is correct.

However, if a retailer is advertising goods for sale at a price at
which
they are unwilling/unable, they are obliged to take (immediate) steps
to
remove the misleading advertising.

In this case, it's clear that the vendor took immediate steps as soon
as
they realised there was a problem, and have therefore acted both legally
and
honourably.

Regards,

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: David Yeend [mailto:david.yeend@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 April 2002 17:53
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Cheap projector


I don't know if it is different for on-line orders under the distance
selling rules or even if the law has changed in the last several months
but
I had to check out a similar situation once.

The office of fair trading (Bless them) confirmed that a vendor was not
actually obliged to sell. The explanation given was that no matter how
something for sale was advertised all a potential purchaser made was an
offer to purchase. The seller was quite within their legal rights to
refuse
to sell - this was a point of law and not down to Ts & Cs. I can
not
remember all of the detail but I think this was a provision of the Sales
of
Goods Act - I may well be wrong here. I think this is explained in a FAQ
on
the Office of Fair Trading WWW site.

I would be interested to know if I have been misguided, or, if there are
any
other legal considerations - misrepresentation or what not.

Anyway, good luck, if you're successful when is the showing, I'll get
the
beer where is the pizza coming from!

David.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nic Blinston [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 April 2002 17:25
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Cheap projector


>>  4.1. The price of the Goods shall be as per the Seller's
>>  price list. All
>>  prices quoted are valid for 30 days after which time they
may
>
>But that bit is in our favour - the price will be as per the price
list! :)


Haven't checked the detail, but does it actually say anywhere that
the prices on the web are THE price list? My guess is that they'd
have a master list somewhere which is the legal one...

Nic


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.