[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Enough CAT5?
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Enough CAT5?
- From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 18:36:05 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Its
not personal!
If I
was re-wiring I WOULD run cat5 to every socket and light switch - as we all
know
X10 isn't always 100% reliable. For everything else I'll continue to use
wireless, with a home made antenna on the "server" high enough up to
guarantee
full coverage.
I
agree that wireless has its limitations, but there's a lot of new stuff on
the
horizon, and it does have a massive advantage - you do't have to
pre-plan.
I
wonder if we'll see Bluetooth or 802.11 based home control
devices?
Tim.
Can't agree
with you on this one Tim - so what's new :-)
I have
both CAT5 and wireless in our home and both have their pros and
cons.
M.
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|