[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: [OT] Bloody Computers :-(
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [OT] Bloody Computers :-(
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 14:33:46 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Yeah ... as was explained to me by Sony VAIO support regarding my PCG-C1F!
Seems my little Sony is built around that chipset...
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 September 2001 12:14
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [OT] Bloody Computers :-(
>
>
> There was also a problem with the early versions of the Intel L2
caching
> chipsets, so that they could only cache the first 64Mb of system RAM.
>
> That slowed things down on 128Mb machines ;-)
>
> Mark Harrison
> Head of Systems, eKingfisher
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pmiller@xxxxxxx [mailto:pmiller@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 September 2001 12:00
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Bloody Computers :-(
>
>
>
> I believe you are talking about the 9x range of windows when anything
> above
> 128Mb of ram was not used correctly and as you said in fact tended to
> slow
> the machine down
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|