RE: OnDigital Signal Breakup...

["Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>]

The question is therefore, when analogue transmissions cease and more
channels become available for digital transmissions then will the current
channels be spread more thinly and upped in bandwidth? After all, I
understand that OnDigital do have a few more channels comming to them from
the UHF spectrum. (You don't have to answer that as I fear I know the
answer.)

As an aside ... I wonder who the intellectually challeged muppet was who
decided the channel spread for the 6 MUXes in my area ... 5 of them are
below channel 40 (where all out analogue channels are too) and the 6th MUX
.... that which carries ITV/ITV2/CH4/E4/Film Four etc ... is up in the
50's.

Of course everyone has wideband aerials here don't they? Nope ... because
we're a "difficult" area for analogue reception then it seems
that most of
the local aerial contractors have been fitting narrow band aerials to try
to
eek out the last bits of gain and knock out bleed from other transmitters.
They're currently doing a roaring trade changing peoples aerials!

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 21 September 2001 20:47
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OnDigital Signal Breakup...
>
>
> Quart/Pint Pot scenario.
>
> Trying to cram too many channels into too little bandwidth leaves no
room
> for error correction. Slightest errors cause noticeable artifacts :-(
>
> Keith
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ian Oliver [mailto:ioliver.lists@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 21 September 2001 14:47
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OnDigital Signal Breakup...
> >
> >
> > In article
> > <NFBBKIIGELIMFOMJFBNCIENOCIAA.phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>,
Phil
> > Harris wrote:
> > > I suppose it gives me an excuse to recable the RF side of
the
> house ...
> > > anyone got any suggestions for a source of good quality
heavily
> > screened RF
> > > lead?
> >
> > CT100.  But despite a new aerial, new CT100 direct to STB, new
> > connectors,
> > big numbers on the meters (aerial installers and box's) and fancy
mains
> > filter I still get breakup.  TBH I think it's part of the
offering. :-(
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ian Oliver
> > Sunny Leeds, UK
> > Using Java on Tini for control via Dallas 1-wire
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>