[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OnDigital Signal Breakup...
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: OnDigital Signal Breakup...
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 15:49:19 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Looks like a free to air sky box could be on the toys list then...
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Oliver [mailto:ioliver.lists@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 21 September 2001 14:47
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OnDigital Signal Breakup...
>
>
> In article
> <NFBBKIIGELIMFOMJFBNCIENOCIAA.phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>,
Phil
> Harris wrote:
> > I suppose it gives me an excuse to recable the RF side of the
house ...
> > anyone got any suggestions for a source of good quality heavily
> screened RF
> > lead?
>
> CT100. But despite a new aerial, new CT100 direct to STB, new
> connectors,
> big numbers on the meters (aerial installers and box's) and fancy
mains
> filter I still get breakup. TBH I think it's part of the offering.
:-(
>
> Regards
>
> Ian Oliver
> Sunny Leeds, UK
> Using Java on Tini for control via Dallas 1-wire
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|