|
|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: Bloody BT!
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Digest Number 1074
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Digest Number 1074
- From: "Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 21:20:32 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Venue:
Old Kings Head
45
Borough High Street
Southwark
(near London Bridge)
M.
I'm up for a meet in London.
Where
is the 'Usual place'?
Steve
-----Original
Message-----
From:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 September
2001 18:31
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: [ukha_d] Digest Number
1074
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx------------------------------------------------------------------------
There
are 25 messages in this issue.
Topics in this
digest:
1. RE: IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
From:
"Murgatroyd, Paul"
<paul.murgatroyd@xxxxxxx>
2.
Re: IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
From:
"Mark McCall"
<mark@xxxxxxx>
3. Re:
Finally! - X10 kits for
sale
From:
"Mark
Hetherington"
<mark.egroups@xxxxxxx>
4. RE: Finally! - X10 kits for
sale
From:
"Graham Howe" <graham@xxxxxxx>
5. RE: Re: Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept
?
From:
"Phil
Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
6. RE: Views on X10
Addressing
From: "Phil Harris"
<phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
7. RE:
[OT] Petrol Pumps ....was Views on X10
Addressing
From: "Phil Harris"
<phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
8. RE:
Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept
?
From:
"Timothy Morris"
<timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
9.
Something to Make TIVO owners
cry.
From:
Stuart Poulton <swp@xxxxxxx>
10. RE:
OT - Digital
Cameras
From:
"K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxx>
11. RE: IPAQ, CF
&
PCMCIA
From: "Timothy Morris"
<timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
12. Re: IPAQ,
CF &
PCMCIA
From:
"Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
13.
Re: New 1 Wire Devices from
Dallas
From:
Ian Oliver <ioliver.lists@xxxxxxx>
14. Re: New 1 Wire Devices from
Dallas
From:
Stuart Grimshaw <stuart@xxxxxxx>
15. RE: Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept
?
From:
"Broadfoot, Kieran J"
<Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx>
16. RE: New 1
Wire
Devices from
Dallas
From:
Keith Doxey <ukha@xxxxxxx>
17. RE: [OT]
Petrol Pumps ....was Views on X10
Addressing
From: "Mark Harrison"
<Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
18. Re: New
1 Wire Devices from
Dallas
From:
Jeff <ukha@xxxxxxx>
19. RE: OT
- Digital
Cameras
From:
"Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
20. Home control
terminal
From:
patrickl@xxxxxxx 21. Re: IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
From:
"K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxx>
22. Re: [OT]
Petrol Pumps ....was Views on X10
Addressing
From: "Geraint Morris"
<geraint@xxxxxxx>
23. Re: IPAQ, CF
&
PCMCIA
From: "Mark McCall"
<mark@xxxxxxx>
24. CAT 5
testers
From:
"Tracey Gardner"
<tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx>
25. Re: Views
on X10
Addressing
From: "the-croft"
<alan@xxxxxxx>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
1
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:13:46 +0100
From:
"Murgatroyd, Paul" <paul.murgatroyd@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE:
IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
sorry to upset everyone, but I think you
should
check here
http://www.semperaptus.com/news/081501.shtml
<http://www.semperaptus.com/news/081501.shtml>
Paul
-----Original
Message-----
From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent:
05 September 2001 12:31
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ukha_d]
IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
I have read there will be a standard and
advanced (something like that)
version of Merlin, designed for 16 and 32
meg machines respectively. Dunno
if this means their RAM or ROM
though?
Certainly does seem that flash upgradeable machines like
iPAQ
will be able
to get the new OS.
M.
----- Original
Message -----
From: Justin <mailto:justin@xxxxxxx>
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx <mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent:
Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF
&
PCMCIA
Thanks Mark.
Now I just have to resist buying one for the
moment and wait for the new
version & hopefully the prices will
drop.
Does anyone know if it will be possible to upgrade an old IPAQ
with the new
MS Pocket PC version that is out
soon?
Justin
----- Original Message -----
From: Mark
McCall
<mailto:mark@xxxxxxx>
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001
11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
Yep...this
is
no problem. This is how I use my Micro Drive in the
iPAQ.
M.
----- Original Message -----
From: Justin
<mailto:justin@xxxxxxx>
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001
11:46 AM
Subject: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
I am thinking of
getting an IPAQ but was wondering if there is any reason
why I could
not
use a PCMCIA to CF adapter so I only have to buy a PCMCIA sleeve but
can
still use CF cards.
Anyone tried
this?
Cheers
Justin
For more information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo!
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Terms of Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
<http://rd.yahoo.com/M=212508.1587435.3138490.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=17050419
92:HM/A=763352/R=0/*http://www.classmates.com/index.tf?s=5085>
<http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?M=212508.1587435.3138490.1261774/D=egroupmai
l/S=1705041992:HM/A=763352/rand=994332608>
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
<http://www.automatedhome.co.uk>
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
the Yahoo! Terms of
<http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
Service.
[This message contained
attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
2
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:57:30 +0100
From:
"Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
I'm not upset at all. You gotta expect that type of
thing. Point is it's
still upgradeable if you want. Most
other
PDAs aren't. No reason not to
install other apps in the main
memory
either, like you have to do with the
latest Media Player
anyway!
Some early iPAQs also have 32 meg ROM I believe (Li?) as 16
meg
ROM chips
were in such short supply.
M.
-----
Original Message -----
From: Murgatroyd, Paul
To:
'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:13
PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
sorry to upset everyone, but I think you should check here
http://www.semperaptus.com/news/081501.shtml
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 September 2001 12:31
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF
& PCMCIA
I have read there will be a
standard and advanced (something like that)
version of Merlin, designed
for
16 and 32 meg machines respectively. Dunno
if this means their RAM
or
ROM though?
Certainly does seem that flash
upgradeable machines like iPAQ will be
able to get the new
OS.
M.
----- Original Message -----
From:
Justin
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday,
September 05, 2001 12:24 PM
Subject: Re:
[ukha_d] IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
Thanks Mark.
Now I just have to resist
buying one for the moment and wait for the
new version & hopefully
the
prices will drop.
Does anyone know if
it
will be possible to upgrade an old IPAQ with
the new MS Pocket PC
version
that is out soon?
Justin
----- Original Message
-----
From: Mark
McCall
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx Sent:
Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:51
AM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d]
IPAQ,
CF & PCMCIA
Yep...this is no problem. This is how I use my Micro Drive in
the
iPAQ.
M.
-----
Original Message
-----
From:
Justin
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:46
AM
Subject:
[ukha_d]
IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
I
am
thinking of getting an IPAQ but was wondering if there is
any
reason
why
I
could not
use a
PCMCIA to CF adapter so I only have to buy a PCMCIA sleeve
but
can
still use CF
cards.
Anyone
tried
this?
Cheers
Justin
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more
information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List
owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Yahoo!
Groups
Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[This message
contained
attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
3
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 12:57:45 -0000
From:
"Mark Hetherington" <mark.egroups@xxxxxxx>
Subject:
Re: Finally! - X10 kits for sale
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Paul Gordon"
<paul_gordon@h...> wrote:
> Unless I'm missing something
obvious
(wouldn't be the 1st time!) I
don't
> seem to able to calculate
Parcelfarce costs without knowing the
destination
Parcel force
costs
follow for ENGLAND, WALES & SCOTLAND
excluding HIGHLANDS &
ISLANDS.
For Northern Ireland, the Standard
service is the same price but the
guaranteed services are slightly
more. (shown in brackets
below)
Guaranteed delivery services up to 10KGs all have one
price
as
follows:
Parcelforce By 9am
£31.85
(NI 71.70)
Parcelforce By 10am £25.90 (NI
58.20)
Parcelforce By Noon £18.30 (NI
41.20)
(Above include £250 compensation insurance which can be increased
for
an additional fee of a couple of pounds)
Parcelforce
24
£14.60 (NI 32.85)
Parcelforce 48
£11.45 (NI 16.00)
(Above
include
£150 compensation insurance which can be increased for
an additional fee
of
a couple of pounds)
Heavier parcels attract higher
prices.
Parcelforce Standard by
weight:
0.5
3.10
1.0
3.10
1.5
4.00
2.0
4.30
2.5
6.50
3.0
6.50
3.5
6.50
4.0
6.50
4.5
7.05
5.0
7.05
5.5
7.05
6.0
7.05
6.5
8.05
7.0
8.05
7.5
8.05
8.0
8.05
8.5
8.65
9.0
8.65
9.5
8.65
10.0
8.65
10.5 and over is flat charge of
10.10
Max 30KG for Standard.
Standard service only has £25
compensation insurance which will cover
single kits. For multiple kits,
additional options are:
£100 compensation for £0.40
£250
compensation for £1.00
£500 compensation for £2.00
For the full
tariffs, visit
http://www.parcelforce.com/tariff/Default.asp?fromintranet=true
and
download the
spreadsheet.
HTH.
Mark.
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
4
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:07:27 +0100
From:
"Graham Howe" <graham@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Finally! - X10 kits
for sale
Parcel Force Standard is the same price to all of the UK
(even
that funny
bit to the left of Wales ;-) so just pick any postcode and
try
it.
Graham
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
5
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:02:31 +0100
From:
"Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Re: Anyone
for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
Erm ... believe me ... I
wouldn't want to!
Phil
> -----Original
Message-----
>
From: Keith Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001
13:32
> To: ukha_d
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Anyone for a
London
Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
>
>
> NO !!!!!!!
>
>
Dont even go there !
>
> Keith
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Phil Harris
[mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001
13:15
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re:
Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept
?
>
>
>
>
Please God not in the same place as Mick hid the sausages on
Survivor!
>
> Phil
>
> > -----Original
Message-----
> > From: Keith Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
>
> Sent: 05 September 2001 11:33
> > To: ukha_d
> >
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept
?
>
>
> >
> > Excellent :-))
> >
> > I
might even conceal a set of KAT5's about my person :-))
>
>
>
> Keith
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
>
>
From: richard@xxxxxxx [mailto:richard@xxxxxxx]
>
> Sent: 05 September 2001 09:58
> > To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Anyone for a London
Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
> >
> >
> >
Keith,
>
>
> > I will be at Plasa on the Tuesday (the company I work for
are
> > exhibiting) So assuming I don't end up having to entertain
any
> > clients then I'm up for a meet.
> >
> >
You
could also pass by the stand and grab a coffee :-)
> >
>
>
Richard Passman
> > Technical Manager AV
> > Northern
Light
Stage and Technical Services Ltd
> > Tel: +44 1491 577870 Fax: +44
1491 637611
> > Mob: +44 7970 916953
> >
>
>
> > --- In ukha_d@y..., "Keith Doxey" <ukha@d...>
wrote:
> > > Sounds good to me.
> > >
> >
> Plasa finishes at 6:00 so by the time I have had a wander round
and
> > possibly
> > > grabbed a bite to eat ( if food
is
not on the agenda ), it will be
> > 7:30.
> >
>
>
> > Keith
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> > List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx> >
> > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
6
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:02:34 +0100
From:
"Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Views on X10
Addressing
> The TF678 Whole House Filter/Coupler can handle
up
to 200A. It should be
> enough for your AV and gadgets
wonderland.
Stick it on the list for the first order once some money
is
coming back into
the house! (Along with the half dozen LD10s, more
Clipsal
faceplates, three
AD10s
etc...)
*grin*
Phil
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
7
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:02:30 +0100
From:
"Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [OT] Petrol
Pumps ....was Views on X10 Addressing
We have a filling station
close
by with the "unleaded + unleaded" pumps ...
I've never worked out why
that
is either!
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
Keith Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001
13:42
> To: ukha_d
> Subject: RE: [OT] Petrol Pumps ....was
[ukha_d] Views on X10 Addressing
>
>
> 4
hoses.
>
> Very advanced.
>
> Most pumps round our
way
only have 2 hoses on each of the 4 pumps.
>
>
Usually....
>
> Unleaded + 4 Star
> Unleaded + 4
Star
> Unleaded + Unleaded (Why 2 the same I DONT
know!!)
>
Unleaded + Diesel.
>
> As the driver of a Diesel vehicle it
NEVER
ceases to amaze me that the
> driver of a Petrol engined vehicle will
pull onto the EMPTY forecourt to
> fill up and stops at the ONLY pump
that has Diesel to fill their car with
> Unleaded. THEN....despite
the
fact that there is a vehicle behind theirs
> with a Diesel engine
knocking away... they go into the shop, spend bloody
> ages choosing
sweets and papers etc before a leisurely stroll
> back to
their
>
car.
>
> Of course.....it ALWAYS happens when I am already in a
rush :-((
>
> I guess the fact that the people round here cant
get
to grips
> with filling a
> fuel tank explains why the local
Homebase took so long to shift all the
> goodies they had on the
shelves.
>
> Keith
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Phil Harris
[mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001
13:15
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Views
on X10 Addressing
>
>
> Very good point ... however
having
met many of my neighbours and finding
> that most of them have just
about got to grips with choosing the
> right hose
> from the
four
possibles on a garage forecourt then home automation is
> somewhat
beyond them.
>
>
>
>
> For more information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
8
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:15:34 +0100
From:
"Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Anyone
for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
No, I'm not taking offence at
all. I hadn't actually noticed the domain
before. But working for the
yanks
you can't have it all ;-)
Tim
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Broadfoot, Kieran J
[mailto:Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001
13:15
>
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone for a London
Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
>
>
> Tim,
>
> Are
you
seriously taking offence at my reference to city types?
> I dont
want
> to go down that road except in private email but please take
note
> of where i
> work and youll notice i had my tongue
firmly
placed in my cheek.
>
> Thanks
>
Kieran
>
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Timothy Morris
[mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05,
2001 12:58 PM
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [ukha_d]
Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
>
>
> Well I
can beat you there, I'm probably one of the people you disparage so
>
easily. Last time I actually went to work it was in a dealing room as
a
> Eurobond Sales Manager.
>
> I could often be seen in
Corney & Barrow at lunchtime ;-)
>
> Tim.
>
>
>
-----Original Message-----
> > From: Broadfoot, Kieran J
[mailto:Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 05 September 2001
12:48
> > To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> > Subject: RE:
[ukha_d] Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
> >
>
>
> > Tim,
> >
> > The words I would like to
use
I cant on this public forum ;-)
> >
> > btw i live 10
minutes from the city and work on fleet street.. i know it
> >
pretty
well.
> >
> > thanks
> >
kieran "city type" broadfoot
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
From:
Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent:
Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone for a London
Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
> >
> >
> > And what
may I
ask is wrong with the city types?
> >
> > Tim - who's
office
address is (officially) 6 Broadgate
> >
> > >
-----Original Message-----
> > > From: Broadfoot, Kieran J
[mailto:Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 05 September 2001
07:51
> > > To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> > >
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
>
> >
> > >
> > > Oh ok then...! Same place as
usual to avoid the city types up
> > > near liverpool
>
>
> street?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
k_i_e_r_a_n ;-)
> > >
>
>
>
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx]
> > >
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:01 PM
> > > To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Anyone for a
London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
> > >
> > >
>
> > Does a bear shit in the woods?.... :-)
> > >
>
> > I'll be working in Brighton that day (and the following day),
but
> > > if I take
> > > train instead of driving,
I'll be getting back into Victoria by about
> > > 6:45-7ish,
and
could be over near Liverpool St. by 7:30 tops.
> > >
>
>
> Hmmm.... Beer..... Keiron?
> > >
> > >
Paul
G.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> >
> >Hi All,
> > > >
> > > >I will be in
London next Tuesday (11th Sept) for the Plasa
> 2001 show at
>
> > >Earls Court (10:00-18:00) and dont have to be back at
>
Liverpool Street
> > > >until
> > >
>23:30.
> > > >
> > > >Anyone fancy
meeting
up somewhere, preferably within easy reach of
> > >
>Liverpool
> > > >Street as I dont know London that
well.
> > > >
> > > >Ian and Patrick
previously
mentioned that they are interested.
> > > Anyone else
>
>
> >fancy joining us somewhere?
> > > >
> >
>
>Keith
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> >
_________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> > List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx> >
> > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> > List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx> >
> > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
9
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:29:10 +0100
(BST)
From: Stuart Poulton <swp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Something to Make
TIVO owners cry.
Take a look at
http://slashdot.org/articles/01/09/05/1225259.shtml
and
then
http://www.replaytv.com/partners_products/replaytv.htm
Basically
it's a tivo, with network interface and up to 320 hours of
record time.
Shame about the price of
$2000
Cheers
Stuart
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
10
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:43:54 +0100
(BST)
From: "K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: OT - Digital
Cameras
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Phil Harris wrote:
> Since
buying
the big Oly E10 I miss having a small point and squirt camera
> that
I
could carry everywhere with me (which is what I used to do with the
>
previous digicams) and I intend getting an IXUS at some point.
LOL.
No
change there then.
Regards,
Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxxLaser
Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
11
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:29:32 +0100
From:
"Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: IPAQ, CF
& PCMCIA
Actually, I've just re-read the article, and I'm pissed
off this time. It
really smacks of the "We'll sell you a device based on
its upgradeability,
but when you upgrade half of the really useful
facilities won't be there". I
get the impression that the features will
be
pulled not for technical, but
for marketing reasons. That's the bit that
makes me cross.
I'm going to scream and scream until I'm
sick.
Tim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark
McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 September 2001
13:58
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ukha_d]
IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
I'm not upset at all. You
gotta
expect that type of thing. Point is it's
still upgradeable if you
want. Most other PDAs aren't. No reason not to
install other
apps in the main memory either, like you have to do with the
latest
Media
Player anyway!
Some early iPAQs also have 32 meg ROM I
believe
(Li?) as 16 meg ROM chips
were in such short supply.
M.
----- Original Message
-----
From: Murgatroyd, Paul
To:
'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Sent: Wednesday, September 05,
2001 1:13 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
sorry to upset everyone, but I think
you
should check here
http://www.semperaptus.com/news/081501.shtml
Paul
-----Original
Message-----
From: Mark McCall
[mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05
September 2001 12:31
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ukha_d]
IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
I have read
there will be a standard and advanced (something like
that) version of
Merlin, designed for 16 and 32 meg machines respectively.
Dunno if this
means their RAM or ROM though?
Certainly
does seem that flash upgradeable machines like iPAQ will be
able to get
the
new OS.
M.
----- Original
Message -----
From:
Justin
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx Sent:
Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:24
PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d]
IPAQ,
CF & PCMCIA
Thanks
Mark.
Now I just have to
resist
buying one for the moment and wait for the
new version & hopefully
the
prices will drop.
Does
anyone know if it will be possible to upgrade an old IPAQ with
the new
MS
Pocket PC version that is out
soon?
Justin
-----
Original Message
-----
From: Mark
McCall
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:51
AM
Subject: Re:
[ukha_d] IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
Yep...this is no problem. This is how I use my Micro Drive in
the
iPAQ.
M.
----- Original Message
-----
From:
Justin
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:46
AM
Subject: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
I am thinking of getting an IPAQ but was wondering if there is
any
reason
why I could
not
use
a PCMCIA to CF adapter so I only have to buy a PCMCIA sleeve
but
can
still use CF
cards.
Anyone tried
this?
Cheers
Justin
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more
information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List
owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Yahoo!
Groups
Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[This message
contained
attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
12
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:48:01 +0100
From:
"Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
In fairness I have upgraded my iPAQ's firmware twice now
(1.69
and 1.77).
That's the type of upgrade I had assumed I could do. I
was
not expecting I
could flash it to the _next generation_ of OS though so
this is a bonus,
however limited.
The way things are going a
current
iPAQ is gonna look very dated even by
this time next year. Sell to
a
mate Tim and buy the new one! :-)
M.
-----
Original
Message -----
From: Timothy Morris
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:29
PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
Actually, I've just re-read the article, and I'm pissed off this time.
It
really smacks of the "We'll sell you a device based on its
upgradeability,
but when you upgrade half of the really useful
facilities
won't be there". I
get the impression that the features will be pulled
not
for technical, but
for marketing reasons. That's the bit that makes me
cross.
I'm going to scream and scream until I'm
sick.
Tim.
-----Original
Message-----
From: Mark McCall
[mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 September
2001 13:58
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subject: Re: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF
& PCMCIA
I'm not upset at all. You
gotta expect that type of thing. Point is
it's still upgradeable
if
you want. Most other PDAs aren't. No reason not
to install
other apps in the main memory either, like you have to do with
the
latest
Media Player anyway!
Some early iPAQs also have
32
meg ROM I believe (Li?) as 16 meg ROM
chips were in such short
supply.
M.
----- Original Message -----
From:
Murgatroyd, Paul
To:
'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Sent: Wednesday,
September 05, 2001 1:13 PM
Subject: RE:
[ukha_d] IPAQ, CF & PCMCIA
sorry
to upset everyone, but I think you should check
here
http://www.semperaptus.com/news/081501.shtml
Paul
-----Original
Message-----
From: Mark
McCall
[mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 September 2001 12:31
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
I have read
there
will be a standard and advanced (something like
that) version of Merlin,
designed for 16 and 32 meg machines respectively.
Dunno if this means
their
RAM or ROM though?
Certainly
does seem that flash upgradeable machines like iPAQ will
be able to get
the
new OS.
M.
-----
Original Message
-----
From:
Justin
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:24
PM
Subject: Re:
[ukha_d] IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
Thanks Mark.
Now
I
just have to resist buying one for the moment and wait for
the new
version
& hopefully the prices will
drop.
Does
anyone know if it will be possible to upgrade an old IPAQ
with the new
MS
Pocket PC version that is out
soon?
Justin
----- Original Message
-----
From: Mark
McCall
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:51
AM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
Yep...this is no problem. This is how I use my Micro Drive in
the
iPAQ.
M.
----- Original Message
-----
From:
Justin
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:46
AM
Subject: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
I am thinking of getting an IPAQ but was wondering if there is
any
reason
why I could
not
use a PCMCIA to CF adapter so I only have to buy a PCMCIA
sleeve but
can
still use CF
cards.
Anyone tried
this?
Cheers
Justin
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms
of
Service.
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more
information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List
owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of
Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Yahoo!
Groups
Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Start
here...
Height:
345678 ft
01234567891011in
Weight:
lbs. kg.
For more
information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[This message
contained
attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
13
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:54:26 +0100
From:
Ian Oliver <ioliver.lists@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New 1 Wire
Devices from Dallas
In article
<002901c13606$77a21860$5dfe9284@xxxxxxx>,
Keith Doxey wrote:
>
DS2408 8 channel PIO (programmable input/output) [FUTURE
DEVICE]
>
64bit address and 1024 bits of OTP eprom
> (ideal for 4 remote
switches with LED's or a small Keypad etc for HA use)
This is the
only
new one. I have digipots. 2-channel PIOs and AtoDs already.
All safe in
little boxes waiting for me to have time to do something.
:-)
Regards
Ian Oliver
Sunny Leeds, UK
Using Java on
Tini
for control via Dallas
1-wire
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
14
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:06:52 +0100
From:
Stuart Grimshaw <stuart@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New 1 Wire
Devices from Dallas
On Wednesday 05 September 2001 14:54 pm, Ian
Oliver
wrote:
> In article <002901c13606$77a21860$5dfe9284@xxxxxxx>,
Keith Doxey wrote:
> > DS2408 8 channel PIO (programmable
input/output) [FUTURE DEVICE]
> > 64bit address and 1024
bits
of OTP eprom
> > (ideal for 4 remote switches with LED's or
a
small Keypad etc for HA
> > use)
>
> This is the only
new
one. I have digipots. 2-channel PIOs and AtoDs
> already. All safe in
little boxes waiting for me to have time to do
> something.
:-)
I
have the same, though I think there must be some 1-wire device
gnomes
somewhere because they are all missing, along with 10
DS18B20's
--
Stuart Grimshaw
<stuart@xxxxxxx>
-
t:07976 625221
f:0870
7060260
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
15
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:15:04 +0100
From:
"Broadfoot, Kieran J" <Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE:
Anyone
for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
no comment
;-)
k.
-----Original Message-----
From: Timothy Morris
[mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001
2:16 PM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone for a
London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
No, I'm not taking offence at
all.
I hadn't actually noticed the domain
before. But working for the yanks
you
can't have it all ;-)
Tim
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Broadfoot, Kieran J
[mailto:Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001
13:15
>
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone for a London
Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
>
>
> Tim,
>
> Are
you
seriously taking offence at my reference to city types?
> I dont
want
> to go down that road except in private email but please take
note
> of where i
> work and youll notice i had my tongue
firmly
placed in my cheek.
>
> Thanks
>
Kieran
>
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Timothy Morris
[mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05,
2001 12:58 PM
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [ukha_d]
Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
>
>
> Well I
can beat you there, I'm probably one of the people you disparage so
>
easily. Last time I actually went to work it was in a dealing room as
a
> Eurobond Sales Manager.
>
> I could often be seen in
Corney & Barrow at lunchtime ;-)
>
> Tim.
>
>
>
-----Original Message-----
> > From: Broadfoot, Kieran J
[mailto:Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 05 September 2001
12:48
> > To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> > Subject: RE:
[ukha_d] Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
> >
>
>
> > Tim,
> >
> > The words I would like to
use
I cant on this public forum ;-)
> >
> > btw i live 10
minutes from the city and work on fleet street.. i know it
> >
pretty
well.
> >
> > thanks
> >
kieran "city type" broadfoot
>
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
From:
Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent:
Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone for a London
Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
> >
> >
> > And what
may I
ask is wrong with the city types?
> >
> > Tim - who's
office
address is (officially) 6 Broadgate
> >
> > >
-----Original Message-----
> > > From: Broadfoot, Kieran J
[mailto:Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 05 September 2001
07:51
> > > To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> > >
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Anyone for a London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
>
> >
> > >
> > > Oh ok then...! Same place as
usual to avoid the city types up
> > > near liverpool
>
>
> street?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
k_i_e_r_a_n ;-)
> > >
>
>
>
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx]
> > >
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:01 PM
> > > To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Anyone for a
London Meet on Tues 11th Sept ?
> > >
> > >
>
> > Does a bear shit in the woods?.... :-)
> > >
>
> > I'll be working in Brighton that day (and the following day),
but
> > > if I take
> > > train instead of driving,
I'll be getting back into Victoria by about
> > > 6:45-7ish,
and
could be over near Liverpool St. by 7:30 tops.
> > >
>
>
> Hmmm.... Beer..... Keiron?
> > >
> > >
Paul
G.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> >
> >Hi All,
> > > >
> > > >I will be in
London next Tuesday (11th Sept) for the Plasa
> 2001 show at
>
> > >Earls Court (10:00-18:00) and dont have to be back at
>
Liverpool Street
> > > >until
> > >
>23:30.
> > > >
> > > >Anyone fancy
meeting
up somewhere, preferably within easy reach of
> > >
>Liverpool
> > > >Street as I dont know London that
well.
> > > >
> > > >Ian and Patrick
previously
mentioned that they are interested.
> > > Anyone else
>
>
> >fancy joining us somewhere?
> > > >
> >
>
>Keith
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> >
_________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>
>
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> > List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx> >
> > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> > List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx> >
> > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
16
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:24:45 +0100
From:
Keith Doxey <ukha@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: New 1 Wire Devices from
Dallas
OK.
So some of the stuff has been out for a while....
but
it was news to me.
As to the disappearing devices.... the problem is
that when an A/D converter
or a Temperature Sensor required a PCB of
Eurocard proportions and dozens of
components to make it work, you
couldnt
loose one that easily. Now they are
little black blobs with a few legs
or
worse still a little surface mount
speck of plastic, you cant see them
on
the bench, never mind finding them
when you "misplace" them
!!!
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Grimshaw
[mailto:stuart@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 September 2001 15:07
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ukha_d] New 1 Wire Devices from
Dallas
On Wednesday 05 September 2001 14:54 pm, Ian Oliver
wrote:
> In article <002901c13606$77a21860$5dfe9284@xxxxxxx>,
Keith Doxey wrote:
> > DS2408 8 channel PIO (programmable
input/output) [FUTURE DEVICE]
> > 64bit address and 1024
bits
of OTP eprom
> > (ideal for 4 remote switches with LED's or
a
small Keypad etc for HA
> > use)
>
> This is the only
new
one. I have digipots. 2-channel PIOs and AtoDs
> already. All safe in
little boxes waiting for me to have time to do
> something.
:-)
I
have the same, though I think there must be some 1-wire device
gnomes
somewhere because they are all missing, along with 10
DS18B20's
--
Stuart Grimshaw
<stuart@xxxxxxx>
-
t:07976 625221
f:0870
7060260
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
17
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:32:58 +0100
From:
"Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [OT]
Petrol Pumps ....was Views on X10 Addressing
Because the 4 pumps are
actually:
Tanks 1 +
2
Tanks 1 +
2
Tanks 1 +
3
Tanks 1 + 4
This lets you
deliver
your "main fuel" (normally Unleaded) to any pump
by filling Tank 1, your
"normal alternative" (normally LRP) to two
pumps, by filling Tank 2, and
your two "specialist fuels" (ULS and
DERV)to one each (by filling
tanks 3 and 4)
The problem comes when you, Mr. local franchise
owner, discover that
no-one in your area is going to pay the premium for
ULS, and you've got
a tank that you end up just selling through rather
than
refilling.
You then wonder "so - what shall I fill it with?", and
decide work out
that:
1: Most people buy UL, so you may as well
have
the "most capacity"
there, and you're still worried about the next fuel
protest, and want
your buffer stocks up.
2: You work out that to
switch from dispensing UL to LRP or DERV at a
pump is more complex than
simply refilling the tank with the new grade.
You need to fit the
smaller
nozzles (such as fit UL cars) to the pumps,
you need to drain the tanks
properly before adding DERV, wheras if you
switch from ULS UL to normal
UL,
you just top up the tank, and let the
first load of customers get a
subtely
lower sulphur level.)
Alternatively, you're doing it this way
because
you PLAN to introduce
ULS later, and want everything wired up properly
for
the launch.
Regards,
Mark Harrison
Head of Systems,
eKingfisher
-----Original Message-----
From: Phil Harris
[mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 5 September 2001 14:03
To:
ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [OT] Petrol Pumps ....was [ukha_d]
Views on X10 Addressing
We have a filling station close by with
the
"unleaded + unleaded" pumps
...
I've never worked out why that is
either!
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
Keith
Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001 13:42
>
To: ukha_d
> Subject: RE: [OT] Petrol Pumps ....was [ukha_d] Views on
X10
Addressing
>
>
> 4 hoses.
>
> Very
advanced.
>
> Most pumps round our way only have 2 hoses on
each
of the 4 pumps.
>
> Usually....
>
> Unleaded + 4
Star
> Unleaded + 4 Star
> Unleaded + Unleaded (Why 2 the
same I DONT know!!)
> Unleaded + Diesel.
>
> As the
driver
of a Diesel vehicle it NEVER ceases to amaze me that the
> driver of
a
Petrol engined vehicle will pull onto the EMPTY forecourt
to
>
fill
up and stops at the ONLY pump that has Diesel to fill their
car
with
> Unleaded. THEN....despite the fact that there is a
vehicle
behind
theirs
> with a Diesel engine knocking away... they go into
the shop, spend
bloody
> ages choosing sweets and papers etc
before a
leisurely stroll
> back to their
> car.
>
> Of
course.....it ALWAYS happens when I am already in a rush
:-((
>
>
I guess the fact that the people round here cant get to grips
> with
filling a
> fuel tank explains why the local Homebase took so long to
shift all
the
> goodies they had on the shelves.
>
>
Keith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Harris
[mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001
13:15
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Views
on X10 Addressing
>
>
> Very good point ... however
having
met many of my neighbours and
finding
> that most of them have
just
about got to grips with choosing the
> right hose
> from the
four
possibles on a garage forecourt then home automation is
> somewhat
beyond them.
>
>
>
>
> For more information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post
message: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxxUnsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxList owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject
to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
_____________________________________________________________________
This
message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus
Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
18
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 16:17:28 +0100
From:
Jeff <ukha@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New 1 Wire Devices from
Dallas
Where is the best place to buy these - mail order would
be
preferable and
somewhere that sold a large range of them not like
M******
one or two.
Does rapid sell any of them - I haven't ordered a
catalogue
yet as the new
one is out in October.
Jeff.
----- Original
Message -----
From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
To: "ukha_d"
<ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 3:24
PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] New 1 Wire Devices from Dallas
>
OK.
>
> So some of the stuff has been out for a while.... but
it
was news to me.
>
> As to the disappearing devices.... the
problem
is that when an A/D
converter
> or a Temperature Sensor required a
PCB of Eurocard proportions and dozens
of
> components to make it
work, you couldnt loose one that easily. Now they
are
> little
black
blobs with a few legs or worse still a little surface mount
> speck
of
plastic, you cant see them on the bench, never mind finding them
>
when
you "misplace" them !!!
>
> Keith
>
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: Stuart Grimshaw
[mailto:stuart@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001 15:07
>
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] New 1 Wire Devices
from Dallas
>
>
> On Wednesday 05 September 2001 14:54
pm,
Ian Oliver wrote:
> > In article
<002901c13606$77a21860$5dfe9284@xxxxxxx>,
Keith Doxey wrote:
>
> > DS2408 8 channel PIO (programmable input/output) [FUTURE
DEVICE]
> > > 64bit address and 1024 bits of OTP
eprom
> > > (ideal for 4 remote switches with LED's or a
small Keypad etc for HA
> > > use)
> >
> >
This
is the only new one. I have digipots. 2-channel PIOs and AtoDs
> >
already. All safe in little boxes waiting for me to have time to do
>
> something. :-)
>
> I have the same, though I think there
must
be some 1-wire device gnomes
> somewhere because they are all
missing,
along with 10 DS18B20's
>
>
> --
>
> Stuart
Grimshaw <stuart@xxxxxxx>
> -
> t:07976
625221
> f:0870 7060260
>
>
> For more
information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
19
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 16:28:35 +0100
From:
"Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: OT - Digital
Cameras
Just because you haven't won the lottery it doesn't stop
you mentally
spending the winnings!
SWMBO has said that I can buy
my
Meridian if I can find another job ... I
fully intend to utilise that
option when (if!) the time arrives.
Phil
> -----Original
Message-----
> From: K. C. Li [mailto:li@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05
September 2001 13:44
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE:
[ukha_d] OT - Digital Cameras
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001,
Phil
Harris wrote:
>
> > Since buying the big Oly E10 I miss
having
a small point and
> squirt camera
> > that I could carry
everywhere with me (which is what I used to
> do with the
>
>
previous digicams) and I intend getting an IXUS at some
point.
>
>
LOL. No change there then.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kwong
Li
> li@xxxxxxx> Laser Business Systems Ltd.
> http://www.laser.com
>
>
>
>
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
20
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 16:01:12 -0000
From:
patrickl@xxxxxxxSubject: Home control terminal
>From today's
slashdot: a large screen phone which should ultimately
run a (shhh!)
Linux
variant once they port it. I could see one of
these being a nice
supplement
to EPOD style control of the house...
http://tuxscreen.net/
Patrick
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
21
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 17:10:51 +0100
(BST)
From: "K. C. Li" <li@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Mark McCall wrote:
> The way
things are going a current iPAQ is gonna look very dated even
> by
this
time next year. Sell to a mate Tim and buy the new one! :-)
We
have four of them, all 32MB Flash ROM units, with two of them
running
Linux
and regularly being updated. Very nice toys.
Regards,
Kwong
Li
li@xxxxxxxLaser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
22
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 17:12:16 +0100
From:
"Geraint Morris" <geraint@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [OT] Petrol
Pumps ....was Views on X10 Addressing
Because the two different unl.
nozzles will come from two seperate tanks.
Most likely they changed a
tank
from supergreen to unleaded at some point
G.
----- Original
Message
-----
From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
To:
<ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:02
PM
Subject: RE: [OT] Petrol Pumps ....was [ukha_d] Views on X10
Addressing
> We have a filling station close by with the
"unleaded + unleaded" pumps
...
> I've never worked out why that
is
either!
>
> Phil
>
> > -----Original
Message-----
> > From: Keith Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
>
> Sent: 05 September 2001 13:42
> > To: ukha_d
> >
Subject: RE: [OT] Petrol Pumps ....was [ukha_d] Views on X10
Addressing
> >
> >
> > 4 hoses.
>
>
> > Very advanced.
> >
> > Most pumps round
our way only have 2 hoses on each of the 4 pumps.
> >
> >
Usually....
> >
> > Unleaded + 4 Star
> >
Unleaded
+ 4 Star
> > Unleaded + Unleaded (Why 2 the same I DONT
know!!)
> > Unleaded + Diesel.
> >
> > As the
driver of a Diesel vehicle it NEVER ceases to amaze me that the
>
>
driver of a Petrol engined vehicle will pull onto the EMPTY forecourt
to
> > fill up and stops at the ONLY pump that has Diesel to fill
their car
with
> > Unleaded. THEN....despite the fact that
there
is a vehicle behind theirs
> > with a Diesel engine knocking
away...
they go into the shop, spend
bloody
> > ages choosing sweets
and
papers etc before a leisurely stroll
> > back to their
>
>
car.
> >
> > Of course.....it ALWAYS happens when I am
already in a rush :-((
> >
> > I guess the fact that the
people round here cant get to grips
> > with filling a
>
>
fuel tank explains why the local Homebase took so long to shift all
the
> > goodies they had on the shelves.
> >
> >
Keith
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
From:
Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 05
September 2001 13:15
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> >
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Views on X10 Addressing
> >
>
>
> > Very good point ... however having met many of my
neighbours
and finding
> > that most of them have just about got to grips
with
choosing the
> > right hose
> > from the four possibles
on a
garage forecourt then home automation is
> > somewhat beyond
them.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> > Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> > Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> > List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx> >
> > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
> >
> >
>
>
>
> For more
information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx> Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx> List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
23
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 17:24:33 +0100
From:
"Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
Take it there's no easy way to tell if you have the 32 meg
ROM
Li?
M.
----- Original Message -----
From:
K. C. Li
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday,
September 05, 2001 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] IPAQ, CF &
PCMCIA
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, Mark McCall
wrote:
> The way things are going a current iPAQ is gonna look very dated
even
> by this time next year. Sell to a mate Tim and
buy
the new one! :-)
We have four of them, all 32MB Flash ROM
units,
with two of them running
Linux and regularly being updated. Very
nice toys.
Regards,
Kwong Li
li@xxxxxxx Laser Business Systems Ltd.
http://www.laser.com
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
Start
here...
Height:
345678 ft
01234567891011in
Weight:
lbs. kg.
For more
information:
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[This message
contained
attachments]
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
24
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 17:28:12 +0100
From:
"Tracey Gardner" <tracey.gardner@xxxxxxx>
Subject: CAT 5
testers
I've just started pulling in my first CAT5 runs and
thought
that I'd
better get myself a cable tester to ensure that I don't end up
with
any faulty cable pairs behind new plaster.
Anyway I plumped
for
the Maplin one that Steve Gordon bought, as like
Steve, Maplin was
handy.
Unfortunately I didn't look at the tester before I bought it
and
I
naively thought that I could just connect bare cable ends to it!
It
turns out that the cables have to have plugs on the end and
I just
hadn't
bargained for that.
So has anybody got any suggestions as to what's the
best course
of action?
If I buy a crimping tool and some plugs, can I
reuse the plugs?
The simplest solution that I've come up with so far
would
be to
buy two plugs and crimp a piece of cable onto each of them with
8
croc clips on the end of that or even a piece of chocolate
block?
Is it possible/practical to get a tester that just takes
bare
cable
ends?
Tracey
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message:
25
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 18:13:15 +0100
From:
"the-croft" <alan@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Views on X10
Addressing
I use the ones suggested by comfort. I have several times
considered
changing everything to one house code as I have an unmodifed
IR453 and it
seems a bit of a hassle to have to proxy the requests for
housecode B thru
comfort.
Then again I don't really NEED to
access
the upstairs stuff from this, and I
could always buy the all housecode
modification....
Alan
Shields
alan@xxxxxxx
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Your
use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
| Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
;) |
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|