Re: Views on X10 Addressing

["Chris Howard" <chris_howard@xxxxxxx>]

--- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark McCall" <mark@a...> wrote:
> Chris
>
> If using Comfort and starting from the default file then downstairs
is A, upstairs is B and outside is L.  This will save a LOT of
reprogramming Comfort responses.  I have used all 16 A codes though
so things are a bit tight downstairs.
>
> M.
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Chris Howard
>   To: ukha_d@y...
>   Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 9:49 AM
>   Subject: [ukha_d] Views on X10 Addressing
>
>
>
>   I am just about to fit my X10 applicance / lighting / din modules
at
>   home and I am interested on peoples views as to the best
addressing
>   scheme for house and unit codes.
>
>   I have Comfort installed, and I know it will expect to see
certain
>   house codes for different parts of the house, unless I start
>   modifying the default responses.
>
>   Does anybody have any strong views on house / unit codes i.e. one
>   house code for upstairs / downstairs, or maybe one per room etc.
>
>   Many thanks
>
>   Chris
>
>
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>               ADVERTISEMENT
>
>                           You can, too! Start here...
>
>                           Height:
>                              345678 ft      01234567891011in
>
>                           Weight:
>                           lbs. kg.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>   Post message: ukha_d@y...
>   Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@y...
>   Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
>   List owner:  ukha_d-owner@y...
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.


Mark,

This is exactly what I am afraid of - running out of unit codes for a
single house code if you assign Downstairs = A, Upstairs = B etc.

I know 16 units is quite a lot but not so far out of reach.

Regards
Chris