[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OT - Digital Cameras
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: OT - Digital Cameras
- From: "Ian B" <Ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:07:53 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I don't know how it is worked out but zoom ratings are different for SLR to
APS to most digital cameras. Just a little food for thought.
The other thing is digital cameras eat batteries so I would want to make
sure that spare rechargeable are to hand and their cost.
Ian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Calum Morrell [mailto:calum@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 04 September 2001 19:49
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OT - Digital Cameras
>
>
> I agree Phil, optical zoom power is the one to look for, digital zoom
is
> only useful where capturing something as large as possible is more
> important than the overall image quality.
>
> I don't know much about digital cameras under gbp4000 so I can't
comment
> on the Kodak ... the main thing to look at is the megapixel rating ...
3
> is good, 2 might be acceptable depending on your needs ... don't go
for
> less than 2 tho.
>
> Is the digital guide in the range of 3x straight or 3x the current
> optical? so a max could be 6x digital? never worked out how they rate
> that bit :/
>
> If you want 'human' contact for any further questions and have access
to
> IRC software, feel free to join us ... server irc.nixhelp.org chan
#ukha
> for related to this list and #photo for specifically photo related
> queries. I'm nicked as drochaid.
>
> good luck ;)
>
> Phil Harris wrote:
>
> > Ignore digital zooms if you're still looking for quality ... they
should
> > only be regarded as an absolute last resort. All they do is
upsample the
> > centre portion of the image and you'll get better results doing
the
> > upsampling in PhotoShop (or such like) as most of the
> upsampling routines
> > are fairly dumb given the limited processing horesepower in
cameras.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Dan James [mailto:UKHA@xxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: 04 September 2001 09:18
> >> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >> Subject: [ukha_d] OT - Digital Cameras
> >>
> >>
> >> Morning all
> >>
> >> I am considering taking the plunge and buying a digital
camera.
> >>
> >> The model I am looking at is a Kodak DX3600 (Found this for
£299 on
> >> www.digitalfirst.co.uk if anyone is interested)
> >>
> >> It is described as having 2x optical zoom and 3x digital...
now the
> >> optical zoom bit I understand, but the digital...
> >>
> >> Will this be viewable when I take the picture (presumably
only on the
> >> LCD not through the viewfinder?) (by my calcs this will
should allow
> >> me to have a focal length of 210mm - lens is 35mm) - the same
as my
> >> SLR.
> >>
> >> and will this be noticeably different in the quality?
> >>
> >> Anything else I should be looking out for?
> >>
> >> Thanks for the patience.
> >>
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> >> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> >> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> >> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|