|
At 19
metres their cable would be cheaper.
At 20
metres KAT5 would be cheaper.
Using
CAT5 is far more flexible and you can afford to cable more locations than
you
actually need to allow for future changes.
What
are they proposing this for?
Door
cameras or normal CCTV distribution ?
I
would like to see how the coax performed at 200 metres as there is probably
a
maximum reel length of 100m anyway which would cost you £380
:-(
Keith
Anybody seen the new wiring scheme proposed by comfort. They
say
sending video over cat5 is too expensive (they don't mention KAT5), and
are
suggesting the manufacture of a 4 way coax with an estimated cost
of £3.80
per metre! Seems like a very expensive and inflexible
solution. Alan Shields alan@xxxxxxx
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
| Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
;) |
|
|
For more information: http://www..automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|