[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: (ukha_d) Batteries...
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: (ukha_d) Batteries...
- From: "Phillip Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:13:21 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
But staff can be stopped and searched on leaving their place of work...
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickl@xxxxxxx [mailto:patrickl@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 28 March 2001 22:10
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: (ukha_d) Batteries...
>
>
> --- In ukha_d@y..., Keith Doxey <ukha.diyha@b...> wrote:
> > Duracell Procell are the same as the normal Duracell batteries
with
> one
> > difference.
> >
> > ProCell are not sold to the public.
> >
> > The idea behind it is to stop employee theft.
>
> Discouraging theft may well be a useful side effect, but there has to
> be more to it than that.
> I mean, how would anyone actually get caught in practical terms? Do
> people stay up at night in case their employers to send the battery
> police round? When they hear the a knock on their door do they hide
> the remotes under the sofa?
> Perhaps it's also a discounting mechanism for Duracell or something?
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|