The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Bik sensor - the next steps


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Bik sensor - the next steps
  • From: "Phillip Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 23:04:43 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

This venture isn't exactly "for profit"...

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stuart Grimshaw [mailto:stuart@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 27 March 2001 22:55
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Bik sensor - the next steps
>
>
> On Tuesday 27 March 2001 22:54 pm, you wrote:
> > Ok guys, we have quite a few people interested so the next step
> is to check
> > out the cost of making the boards professionally. Parts look as
> though they
> > will be around 25 pounds or so.
> >
> > I will create the circuit in Proteus and remake the PCB so that
gerber
> > files etc. can be output for the PCB company. Keith - any words
> of wisdom
> > here as you have done this before?
> >
> > Once we have a complete price it will be decision time.
> >
> > Oh, and we need a name for the project along the lines of KAT5.
> Suggestions
> > welcome.
> >
> > Ian
>
> I'd watch out Ian, on his website the guy says that making your
> own is for
> non-profit only, I'm not sure how they might react if someone had
> a shed load
> of the boards made.
>
> Also, what kind of numbers are you looking at? Would it not be cheaper
to
> produce them at home?
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.