[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Scan Today - moan
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Scan Today - moan
- From: "Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:55:54 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Mate ordered the 1oz CF card last time it was on and paid FIFTEEN QUID to
have it posted supposedly overnight.
A week later he still hadn't got it!
Moaned until he got the 15 quid refunded though. Make sure you get
something out of them for your trouble.
Scan have some good offers but they can be really pants sometimes.
M.
>-----Original Message-----
>From:
>sentto-1109639-8427-985714351-mark=automatedhome.co.uk@xxxxxxx
>om
>[mailto:sentto-1109639-8427-985714351-mark=automatedhome.co.uk@xxxxxxx
>nelist.com]On Behalf Of peter.white@xxxxxxx
>Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 5:51 PM
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: [ukha_d] Scan Today - moan
>
>
>Having placed my order with Scan for the SoHo network kit and a
>64MB smart media
>card last Friday, I'd hoped to have received them by now.
>
>Having not arrived, and with their on-line tracking database
>'being updated' (ie
>broke), I decided to ring. A mere 25 minutes later telephone
>muppet #1 explains
>that they are out of stock on the SoHo kit. I explain that it
>says, in bold
>letters, that everything on this page (today only) is ALWAYS IN
>STOCK. He has
>no answers, so I'm passed onto muppet #2, who explains that the
statement
>'always in stock' refers to the stock levels at the start of
>day, and does not
>imply that the items are actually always in stock. Silly me.
>
>At least the p&p is reasonable. Not.
>
>Ok winge over - I feel (a bit) better now.
>
>Pete
>
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|