RE: Re: Kieran's comments was Last Night in London?

["Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>]

Darren - read this AFTER my reply - but your thinking is pretty identical
to
mine!

...and Fools never differ

:-)

M.



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Henderson [mailto:shmern@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 22 June 2001 21:13
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: Kieran's comments was Last Night in London?
>
>
> >I am not against them for HA as some form of control element or
> >console I just would not trust them to do the lot. Also pc's at
home
> >tend to get allsorts of junk loaded on them.....Darling I am just
> >going to reboot the house again....
> >
> >John
>
> ahh but thats the whole thing, you do NOT just install junk on
> the server, A
> clean OS install and just the apps to do the controlling.
>
> Thats it, I mean in a corporate environment thats what happens
> (or should).
> The servers are untouchable after they are setup.
>
> My Win2K box is so stable it surprised me, The only time it goes down
is
> when I SP it or upgrade one of the apps (Homeseer etc..).
>
> So if don't just treat the server as a desktop pc then it will be
stable.
>
> Now I agree if you could get a piece of dedicated hardware (like HV)
to be
> as flexible as a pc with homeseer then I'd go for it, but until you
guys
> build it I'll stick with a pc ;o)
>
> Darren
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/