The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: ShowShifter Review


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: ShowShifter Review
  • From: "Paul Gordon" <paul_gordon@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:24:53 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I was on a training course a couple of weeks ago, given by a trainer who is
a member of the IETF. He told me there is about another 10 years of life in
IPV4 before it becomes unmanageable, and also, the whole of IPV6 is not
quite there yet, - some of the VPN protocols have not yet been written
apparently...


Paul G.


>From: Mark Harrison <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
>Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:57:26 +0100
>
>IPV6 is "already there", just virtually no-one has bothered
implementing
>it.
>
>The "problem" that IPV6 was meant to solve was one of lack of
space left in
>the IPV4 address space.
>
>However, NAT (Network Address Translation) has dealt with virtually all
of
>the problems that were believed to be there. Virtual Hosting has dealt
with
>some of the other problems.
>
>Basically, it's a lot cheaper to install a load of NAT IPV4 kit than it
>would be to install IPV6 stuff, so why bother?
>
>Mark Harrison
>IT Controller, eKingfisher
>
>****************************************************************************
>Kingfisher plc
>Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London NW1
5PX
>Registered in England, Number 1664812
>
>This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed
and
>may contain confidential information.  Unless stated to the contrary,
any
>opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent
the
>official view of the company.  If you have received this e-mail in
error,
>please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
message
>from your system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or
>disclose its contents to any other person.  Thank you for your
>co-operation.
>****************************************************************************
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: 21 June 2001 11:56
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
>
>
>When's this new IP stuff coming?  There's one for each grain on sand on
the
>planet or something like that.
>
>M.
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Michael Mc Aree" <michael.mcaree@xxxxxxx>
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:50 AM
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
>
>
> > Virtual hosting. Basically there is a finite number of IP
addresses and
>an
> > infintite number of websites/domains. Therefore something had to
be done
>to
> > accommodate them all. I would have removed all the crap sites
first :-)
> >
> > M
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: James Hoye [mailto:james.hoye@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 21 June 2001 11:44
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
> > >
> > >
> > > This email was delivered to you by The Free Internet,
> > > a Business Online Group company. http://www.thefreeinternet.net
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > PS your site is down at the moment, well it
from here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fine from here.
> > > >
> > > > Must be crapnet, I still cannot see it from any of my
systems,
> > > > think it must
> > > > be a temporary DNS problem I cannot even ping it
> > >
> > > I can see it OK.
> > >
> > > Here's a question for the TCP/IP experts:
> > >
> > > If I tracert to www.automatedhome.co.uk I get an IP address
of
> > > 216.167.90.227.  So if I go to http://216.167.90.227 I get Laser's
>site
>(I
> > > know Li kindly hosts Mark's site) - why is this?  Just
curious.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________
> > > Automated Home UK
> > > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > ____________________________________
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> > ###############################################
> > This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have
received
> > it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or
disclose
> > the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The
contents of
> > this message may contain personal views which are not the views
of the
> > company, unless specifically stated.
> > #################################################
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________
> > Automated Home UK
> > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > ____________________________________
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>
>
>
>
>____________________________________
>Automated Home UK
>http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>____________________________________
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>_____________________________________________________________________
>This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
>MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
>http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.