The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: ShowShifter Review


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Re: ShowShifter Review
  • From: "Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:23:53 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • References: <9gsqqm+5gd5@xxxxxxx>
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

About to try one of the USB "My Internet Phones" from here...
http://www.quicknet.net/

They also fo a PCI card version which means you can plug in a DECT phone or
whatever and use it around the house.

M.



----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan James" <daniel@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 1:54 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: ShowShifter Review


> We're not here, I was working for C&W up until about a month ago
and
> a large number of their customers were buying.
>
> Agreed on the timescales, there are probably around 10 major
> companies that I know of that have adopted it. Until the Qos issues
> are sorted it is not worth looking at, although it is worth buying IP
> enabled PBXs... and IP VPN (that's if you can find a telco with any
> capacity left, this has been the Telco equivalent to the homebase x10
> kits :-)
>
> Dan
>
>
> --- In ukha_d@y..., Mark Harrison <Mark.Harrison@e...> wrote:
> > I did say "virtually no-one", rather than
"no-one" ;-)
> >
> > Are you using VoIP? We looked at it (in March) for our new
office,
> and
> > decided that a more "traditional" solution was still
wildy more
> > cost-effective. I don't see wide actual usage before 2004.
> >
> > Mark Harrison
> > IT Controller, eKingfisher
> >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> ******
> > Kingfisher plc
> > Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London
> NW1 5PX
> > Registered in England, Number 1664812
> >
> > This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is
> addressed and
> > may contain confidential information.  Unless stated to the
> contrary, any
> > opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not
> represent the
> > official view of the company.  If you have received this e-mail
in
> error,
> > please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
> message
> > from your system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any
> purposes, or
> > disclose its contents to any other person.  Thank you for your
co-
> operation.
> >
> **********************************************************************
> ******
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dan James [mailto:daniel.james@xxxxxxx...]
> > Sent: 21 June 2001 13:34
> > To: ukha_d@y...
> > Subject: [ukha_d] Re: ShowShifter Review
> >
> >
> > IPV6 is being used in Telco, as it offers better QOSy.... and
means
> > VoIP is a possiblity, C&W were looking at it for there
backbones.
> >
> > --- In ukha_d@y..., Mark Harrison <Mark.Harrison@e...>
wrote:
> > > IPV6 is "already there", just virtually no-one has
bothered
> > implementing it.
> > >
> > > The "problem" that IPV6 was meant to solve was one
of lack of
> space
> > left in
> > > the IPV4 address space.
> > >
> > > However, NAT (Network Address Translation) has dealt with
> virtually
> > all of
> > > the problems that were believed to be there. Virtual Hosting
has
> > dealt with
> > > some of the other problems.
> > >
> > > Basically, it's a lot cheaper to install a load of NAT IPV4
kit
> > than it
> > > would be to install IPV6 stuff, so why bother?
> > >
> > > Mark Harrison
> > > IT Controller, eKingfisher
> > >
> > >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> > ******
> > > Kingfisher plc
> > > Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road,
London
> > NW1 5PX
> > > Registered in England, Number 1664812
> > >
> > > This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is
> > addressed and
> > > may contain confidential information.  Unless stated to the
> > contrary, any
> > > opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not
> > represent the
> > > official view of the company.  If you have received this
e-mail
> in
> > error,
> > > please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete
this
> > message
> > > from your system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any
> > purposes, or
> > > disclose its contents to any other person.  Thank you for
your co-
> > operation.
> > >
> >
> **********************************************************************
> > ******
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx...]
> > > Sent: 21 June 2001 11:56
> > > To: ukha_d@y...
> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
> > >
> > >
> > > When's this new IP stuff coming?  There's one for each grain
on
> > sand on the
> > > planet or something like that.
> > >
> > > M.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael Mc Aree"
<michael.mcaree@t...>
> > > To: <ukha_d@y...>
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:50 AM
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
> > >
> > >
> > > > Virtual hosting. Basically there is a finite number of
IP
> > addresses and an
> > > > infintite number of websites/domains. Therefore
something had
> to
> > be done
> > > to
> > > > accommodate them all. I would have removed all the crap
sites
> > first :-)
> > > >
> > > > M
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: James Hoye [mailto:james.hoye@xxxxxxx...]
> > > > > Sent: 21 June 2001 11:44
> > > > > To: ukha_d@y...
> > > > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This email was delivered to you by The Free
Internet,
> > > > > a Business Online Group company.
> http://www.thefreeinternet.net
> > > > >
--------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > > > > > > > PS your site is down at the moment,
well it from here.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Fine from here.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Must be crapnet, I still cannot see it from
any of my
> systems,
> > > > > > think it must
> > > > > > be a temporary DNS problem I cannot even ping
it
> > > > >
> > > > > I can see it OK.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here's a question for the TCP/IP experts:
> > > > >
> > > > > If I tracert to www.automatedhome.co.uk I get an
IP address of
> > > > > 216.167.90.227.  So if I go to http://216.167.90.227 I get
> > Laser's site
> > > (I
> > > > > know Li kindly hosts Mark's site) - why is this? 
Just
> curious.
> > > > >
> > > > > James
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ____________________________________
> > > > > Automated Home UK
> > > > > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > > > ____________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ###############################################
> > > > This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If
you have
> > received
> > > > it in error, please delete it from your system, do not
use or
> > disclose
> > > > the information in any way, and notify me immediately.
The
> > contents of
> > > > this message may contain personal views which are not
the views
> > of the
> > > > company, unless specifically stated.
> > > > #################################################
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ____________________________________
> > > > Automated Home UK
> > > > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > > ____________________________________
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________
> > > Automated Home UK
> > > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > ____________________________________
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> _____________________________________________________________________
> > > This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> > > MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information
visit
> > > http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________
> > Automated Home UK
> > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > ____________________________________
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> _____________________________________________________________________
> > This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> > MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
> > http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.