The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Pronto !!! 1mb or 2mb


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Pronto !!! 1mb or 2mb
  • From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 12:16:40 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

There's a small utility on the ProntoEdit download pages which will compress all of the graphics in a .ccf file without altering their appearance. If you have a heavily graphic laden config, this can save a LOT of space.
 
Tim.
-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 20 July 2001 23:48
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: RE: [ukha_d] Pronto !!! 1mb or 2mb

I am in the process of completely rebuilding my CCF file for my 1Mb Pronto. At the moment I have got as far as loading 500 buttons and learning Ir codes against each of them. I still have 75% memory free. As far as I can see, the only way you are likely to require the 2Mb version is if you are going t have lots of fancy graphics, background pictures and large CD jukebox listings. There is no way you are going t run out of memory if you are simply replacing other remotes.
 
Graham



____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________


Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.