[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: Napco Gemini 3200 versus Comfort
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Re: Napco Gemini 3200 versus Comfort
- From: "Neil F" <automated@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 19:22:56 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- References: <96p64u+cqsf@xxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> If you just want to program the system, then the UCMCSX is all you
> need. However, we will phase out the UCMDEV kit, because the latest
> Comfort's are being supplied with the firmware which was supplied
> with the UCMDEV which means that you have the RS232 support(for own
> apps) on the standard Comfort panels and when combined with the
> UCMCSX.
Thanks Andrew, that makes it much clearer
Neil
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|