[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Kicked Off Plus Net NOW!!
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Kicked Off Plus Net NOW!!
- From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 13:03:37 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Harrison [mailto:mark.harrison@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 01 February 2001 12:55
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Kicked Off PlusNet NOW!!
>
>
> Can you think of one other area of business where providers regularly
> promise things they can't deliver, then claim that people are
> "abusing their
> service" and cut them off with no warning.
>
> Where I came in - This is not a question about whether PlusNet
> have acted in
> the best interests of the majority of their customers and
> shareholders (they
> have!), but whether PlusNet have breached the Advertising Standards...
>
> Mark
>
>
Agreed. They do have a case to answer to. If I wasn't one of the lucky ADSL
enabled people, then I would make sure that I had an email printed off
confirming that any service I was signing up for could be used in the
manner
I intended. Unfortunately with all of these ISP contracts they are worded
unfairly in the ISPs favour with the 'management reserves the right to kick
you off if they feel like it clauses', and because the sums of money are
relatively small, unless a large group of users are prepared to get
together
and challenge them on a class action basis, they are never likely to come
to
court.
If you take them to the ASA, all that will happen is that their knuckles
will be rapped.
Tim.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|