The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: moving away from the remote-control paradigm


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: moving away from the remote-control paradigm
  • From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennethwatt@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 21:16:19 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I did this yonks ago in my bathroom, I posted it up on this group at one
point.

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mick Furlong [mailto:dorsai@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 08 August 2001 16:57
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] moving away from the remote-control paradigm

It should be possible to come up with a reasonably reliable system using
a
combination of beam breaks and PIRs. For example beam in living room
door is
broken plus activity on PIR in Living room = living room occupied, beam
in
living room door broken and no activity on PIR = living room empty. If
you
couple this with counting beam breaks you will have a reasonably
reliable
system especially if you set the timing so that the system only flags
the
Living room as empty once there has been no movement for say 10
mins....personally I can't sit still for 5 mins unless I am asleep ;)

Mick

Mark McCall <mark@xxxxxxx> said:

> Remember reading way back at the start about this guy that had two IR
beams
in his door frame.  Order they were broken in gave direction of travel
and
central controller kept a count of people as they went in and out so it
didn't turn lights out until it knew there was no one left in the room.
>
> He couldn't figure out why lights were still on one time and no one
was in
the room.  Then he remembered he'd carried a chair into the room which
was
slightly in front of him and seen as another person :-)
>
> Nothing's perfect in this game.
>
> M.
>
>   ----- Original Message -----
>   From: Mark Harrison
>   To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>   Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 4:39 PM
>   Subject: RE: [ukha_d] moving away from the remote-control paradigm
>
>
>   Kieran,
>
>   Thanks.
>
>   Is there some way of sensing not just that I've been through a
doorway
>   (broken a beam), but to tell which DIRECTION I was going in.
>
>   Given that there are only 2 of us in the house, it wouldn't be
beyond
>   the wit of man to be able to say that "person enters
room", ROOM IS
NOW
>   OCCUPIED, "person enters room", "person leaves",
"person leaves",
ROOM
>   IS NOW EMPTY ... type of thing, but this is contingent on being able
to
>   detect the diffence between "enters" and
"leaves".
>
>   Regards,
>
>   Mark Harrison
>   Head of Systems, eKingfisher
>
>         Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
>
>
>
>   ____________________________________
>   Automated Home UK
>   http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>   ____________________________________
>
>   Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>   Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
>   Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>   List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
>   Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

>
>



--






____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



_________________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com





Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.