The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WAS : Starspeeder NOW - ISDN Internet Access


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: WAS : Starspeeder NOW - ISDN Internet Access
  • From: geraint@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2001 19:29:48 -0000
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Looks that way to me as well...

if i use Highway with no call allowance (won't need as this is purely=20
for 0800 internet access), then it'll cost =A327 per quarter, whereas=20
isdn2e costs =A335 for the same....

The only thing I can't find out info on is wether highway has any=20
issues when running via a router, as in effect I want to have the=20
whole network (6 clients) able to ask directly, including the=20
exchange server dialing in for mail etc...

I think it should be ok, so i'm basically looking at about =A3100 per=20
month for 128k access 24/7.....
makes you sick to think the adsl boys get much faster links for =A340 a=20
month...

Regards
Geraint.


--- In ukha_d@y..., Matthew Keay <m@i...> wrote:
> well.. apparently isdn2e is more expensive but gets more *features*
(?)
> such as CLID.. which you cant get on home highway (i think, could be
> wrong) however - if your going to use 128k constantly, and have 3
> PSTN's...well.. you only need the line..hehe, so homeh'd prolly be
> better.
>=20
> Mjk.
>=20
> geraint@a... wrote:
> >=20
> > well i've requested a brochure....
> >=20
> > =A360 a month I can handle, especially with the 254 static IP
> > addresses, that would come in useful....
> >=20
> > now i better just get an isdn line fitted again....
> >=20
> > any ideas;;;;highway or isdn2e ?
> >=20
> > i've got three analogue lines allready, but i'd prefer not to=20
disrupt
> > them with highway....
> >=20
> > thanks
> > g
> >=20
> > --- In ukha_d@y..., Matthew Keay <m@i...> wrote:
> > >
> > > and.. its called the Demon superstore package...doh! :)
> > >
> > > Mjk.
> > >
> > > Matthew Keay wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Demon offer =A340 for 64k and a single IP, or =A360 for
upto 254=20
IPs,
> > 128k
> > > > 24/7 and various other "business" features.
> > > >
> > > > www.demon.net ;)
> > > >
> > > > Mjk.
> > > >
> > > > geraint@a... wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Had a look at Demon, but couldn't find a package
which gave=20
128k
> > > > > bonded....found one using surftime for =A340 but
it was only
> > single
> > > > > channel....they covered both lines, so you could
use 2 x=20
64k,
> > but not
> > > > > 1 bonded channel of 128k.
> > > > >
> > > > > Anyone else on the group using ISDN (It Still
Does=20
Nothing), if
> > > > > so,,,who are you using as an ISP ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Kind Regards
> > > > >
> > > > > Geraint.
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark McCall"
<mark@a...> wrote:
> > > > > > Now that RADSL is on the cards I'm well
within the=20
distance
> > limit.
> > > > > However, being on a rural exchenge dear knows how
long I'm
> > gonna have
> > > > > to wait for availability.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've tried the 24/7 ISDN thing and been
kicked off two=20
ISPs.
> > I
> > > > > think if you pay Demon 40 quid a months though you
can have=20
true
> > > > > always on ISDN.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Satellite does seem a bit flakey still
although=20
StarSpeeder
> > is much
> > > > > better than EON ever was.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > M.
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   ISDN (which used to cost me a fortune, if I
wanted=20
128k) or
> > > > > Satellite
> > > > > >   service, which is still a nightmare as it's
only fast=20
on the
> > > > > >   downwards band.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   I've been told by the colleague at work
that he runs his
> > ISDN2e
> > > > > >   service in bonded mode via a router on a
permanent
> > connection
> > > > > basis.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   Now I know we've had the Terms and
Conditions debate
> > before....I
> > > > > >   wonder where we now stand, as the goalposts
seem to=20
move on
> > a
> > > > > daily
> > > > > >   basis....
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   oh well,,,,teach me to live in the sticks
won't it....
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   regards
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   g
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >   --- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark McCall"
<mark@a...> wrote:
> > > > > >   > According to my mate it's off air at
the moment!!
> > Something to
> > > > > do
> > > > > >   with them moving location I think.  He
hasn't had=20
service
> > for a
> > > > > while
> > > > > >   now although there has been talk of a free
months sub=20
for
> > the
> > > > > hassle.
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   > Kwong Li is a user too and might know
more.
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   > M.
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >   ----- Original Message -----
> > > > > >   >   From: geraint@a...
> > > > > >   >   To: ukha_d@y...
> > > > > >   >   Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 5:31
PM
> > > > > >   >   Subject: [ukha_d] Starspeeder
Satellite Internet
> > (Mark ?)
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >   I know a while back there was some
mention of using
> > > > > starspeeder.
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >   I've had the offer of a dish, lnb
and pentmedia=20
card for
> > > > > use...
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >   Does anyone know why registration
for Starspeeder=20
has
> > been
> > > > > >   >   unavailable for over a month now.
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >   I think Mark knew someone who had
installed it. Do=20
you
> > know
> > > > > what
> > > > > >   he
> > > > > >   >   thinks of it and the connection
speed.
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >   The card is a bargain etc, but I
don't want to buy=20
it,
> > if I
> > > > > am
> > > > > >   not
> > > > > >   >   going to be able to use it...
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >   Kind Regards
> > > > > >   >
> > > > > >   >   Geraint.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.