[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Now I am *REALLY* hacked off!!!
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Now I am *REALLY* hacked off!!!
- From: patrickl@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:36:44 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Ahh, sorry for the misunderstanding.
Good luck in your battle!
Patrick
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Dr John Tankard" <john@t...> wrote:
> > HAH! - you're kidding aren't you! - BT? that bunch of money-
> grabbing,
> > feet-dragging, obstructionist, monopolist ***tards
> <snip/
> Well normally I'd be amongst the first to BT bash - but I was a bit
> confused about John's case.
> Surely the router had to be multi-link enabled to bond the two
> channels simultaneously? Relying on the ISP to reject bonding
> requests so that only one channel is used doesn't seem very
sensible.
> If this is right then BT can't take all the blame... Or am I barking
> up the wrong tree here?
>
> Patrick
> /snip
>
> Wrong tree, My router has always be set to single channel, it has
never
> connected using both channels. I want it that way so my phone / fax
lines
> are always ready to answer. When I rang the help line three months
ago I
> told them I was using home highway but wanted only one channel and
that I
> was on Anytime, on there help page it lists two numbers on for
multichannel
> and one for Anytime single channel, they just gave be the wrong
number.
> Perhaps I should have checked.
>
> I have yet the here back from BT customer service team despite 5
phone calls
> lone letter and three emails, but I just hope they put there hands
up and
> correct their mistake, If they do my respect will be restored.
>
> John
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|