[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OT: DNS Experts out there?
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: OT: DNS Experts out there?
- From: andy.powell@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:54:17 +0200
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Sorry Nick,
Just to confirm. When you say the A record do you mean the IP side or the
automated.it side i.e.
automated.it. A 192.168.0.1
mail.automated.it MX 1 192.168.0.1
or
automated.it. A 192.168.0.1
mail.automated.it MX 1 automated.it.
A.
"Nick Shore" <nick.shore@xxxxxxx>
04/04/2001 16:46
Please respond to ukha_d
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: DNS Experts out there?
MX records should only point to A records, otherwise some mail servers
won't
follow them.
Hope that helps
Nick.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: andy.powell@xxxxxxx [mailto:andy.powell@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 14:57
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: DNS Experts out there?
>
>
> Des,
>
> I was just concerned that
>
> 1. It was generally ok (excluding the fact that I'd left out the SOA
> detail)
> 2 . the fact that the
>
> mail.automated.it. IN MX 1
mail.automated.it.
>
> pointed to a CNAME not an IP. I assumed (danger Will Robinson, danger)
> that it would resolve back to the automated.it A record but wasn't
sure
> and wanted clarification..
>
>
> At the moment I'm just trying to get it all right in my head
> before taking
> the plunge. I've decided that I'd rather just use a caching DNS server
> locally and use either a pay or free DNS service to be the SOA. Some
(the
> ones I'm interested in) services will allow you to define your
> own records
> from a browser/email.
>
> What I'm really after is somewhere that offers this flexibility but
that
> has a low TTL is a change has been made.. after which the TTL could go
up
> (if you get my drift).
>
>
> Thanks for the example, but because your ftp and www point to IP
> addresses
> rather than CNAMEs it's caused me to be doubly unsure on number 2.
above.
>
> A.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Des Gibbons" <des@xxxxxxx>
> 04/04/2001 15:48
> Please respond to ukha_d
>
>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> cc:
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: DNS Experts out there?
>
>
> $TTL 2h
> @ IN SOA ns2.niwebhosting.com.
> hostmaster.niwebhosting.com. (
> 2001020101 ; serial
> 3600 ; refresh
> 900 ; retry
> 1209600 ; expire
> 43200 ; default_ttl
> )
> mail IN A 192.168.0.1
> @ IN MX 5 mail
> @ IN NS ns2.niwebhosting.com.
> @ IN NS ns.niwebhosting.com.
> @ IN A 192.168.0.2
> ftp IN A
> 192.168.0.2
> www IN A
> 192.168.0.2
>
>
> thats one of my dns files if its any use, ips have been changed, but
note
> that mail. is a seperate machine.
>
> Hope that helps
>
> btw, what exactly is the prob?
>
> DesG
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *********************** DISCLAIMER **************************
> This message is intended only for use by the person
> to whom it is addressed. It may contain information
> that is privileged and confidential. Its content does
> not constitute a formal commitment by Lombard Odier.
> If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> kindly notify the sender immediately and destroy this
> message. Thank you.
> *************************************************************
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|