The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: ACE


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: OT: DNS Experts out there?


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: OT: DNS Experts out there?
  • From: andy.powell@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:49:12 +0200
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

So, theoretically, I could submit 2 updates the first with a TTL of 900
for all the records. and then 20 minutes later submit an identical one
with the TTL for each record as 43200 (12 hours) and it would cause other
nameservers to pick up the new records quicker???

A.






"Broadfoot, Kieran" <Kieran.Broadfoot@xxxxxxx>
04/04/2001 16:43
Please respond to ukha_d


To:     "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:        RE: [ukha_d] OT: DNS Experts out there?

I must confess I havent been paying full attention to this thread but you
can set the TTL for an individual entry as below.

bob              900             IN              A 192.168.10.10

The TTL being 900 seconds.

thanks
Kieran

-----Original Message-----
From: andy.powell@xxxxxxx [mailto:andy.powell@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 3:32 PM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: DNS Experts out there?


>if you can define the records, can you not define the TTL?

Not if I can't change the SOA details. (is that correct??) I thought that
the TTL was part of the SOA record. I'm not sure of anyone who will let
you change the SOA record yourself...

>hmmm, not enough of an expert to know if your example will work without
trying it :/

:-(

A.





"Des Gibbons" <des@xxxxxxx>
04/04/2001 16:34
Please respond to ukha_d


To:     <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
cc:
Subject:        RE: [ukha_d] OT: DNS Experts out there?


> What I'm really after is somewhere that offers this flexibility but
that
> has a low TTL is a change has been made.. after which the TTL could go
up
> (if you get my drift).

if you can define the records, can you not define the TTL?



>
>
> Thanks for the example, but because your ftp and www point to IP
> addresses
> rather than CNAMEs it's caused me to be doubly unsure on number 2.
above.

hmmm, not enough of an expert to know if your example will work without
trying it :/

DesG





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/







*********************** DISCLAIMER **************************
This message is intended only for use by the person
to whom it is addressed. It may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. Its content does
not constitute a formal commitment by Lombard Odier.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
kindly notify the sender immediately and destroy this
message. Thank you.
*************************************************************




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/







Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.