[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Lower Lower Price on DDAR
- From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:49:08 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Maybe I'm not being clear enough. This is designed as an exercise to give
mp3 a torture test. I'm doing it to satisfy my curiosity more than anything
else. I listen to CDs in one room only - I live in a large, open plan
single
story (detached, thank god) house, so have no need for whole house audio.
If
I want "wallpaper music", then I turn on Virgin radio through Sky
digital -
horribly compressed, but good enough for background music. If I want to
listen to music (which I do sitting in between the two main speakers) then
I
am prepared to get up every half hour or so and change the CD. I have no
desire to set up a Jukebox - it doesn't match my lifestyle!
Tim.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 02 April 2001 09:45
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Lower Lower Price on DDAR
>
>
> > It was actually a serious question. I'm going to do the test
blind - I
> won't
> > know whether I'm listening to an mp3 or a raw file - I'll just
> set the DVD
> > player to "random" turn the display off, and let it
choose
> which track to
> > play...
>
> Why not take the convience of a hard-disk based system then, but with
> un-compressed, or loss-less compressed source files.
>
> M.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|