[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: widescreen
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: widescreen
- From: "Steve Morgan" <steve@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:54:11 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Doxey [mailto:keith.doxey@xxxxxxx]
> <RANT MODE ON>
> Not like all these "Shortscreen" TV's in the shops.
> I am used to the height of the picture on my 4:3 28" Mitsubish
and would
> expect widescreen to be the same height but WIDER. Even a 32" WS
set is an
> inch shorter :-(
> </RANT MODE OFF>
> Keith
Indeed. The very reason I waited until I could afford a 36" widescreen
is
because I didn't want a screen that was shorter than the 28" it was to
replace.
I now have a Panasonic 36" Tau, which is nice.
Steve
P.S. Your XML is syntactically invalid.
Can I suggest something like...
<OPINION MODE="RANT">
</OPINION>
though Microsoft may have a BizTalk schema that offers an alternative.
(Sorry, just got back from a .NET Developers Conference)
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/2065/_/975679032/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|