[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: ISDN vs ADSL
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: ISDN vs ADSL
- From: "Steve Morgan" <steve@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 13:39:24 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Hmm, perhaps I can sense a software solution coming for this problem.
I've been doing some work with pluggable protocols for Internet Explorer
over the last couple of weeks and wonder if there's some scope there. If we
can get _some_ kind of messages flowing backwards and forwards across the
connection, there's scope to encapsulate the HTTP protocol within another
customer protocol (kind of like a higher level RFC1006 which is OSI over
TCP/IP). That way, a pluggable protocol handler in IE could access a
gateway
that fronted the web server with the HTTP traffic being encapsulated and
hence, slip past BT's filtering.
It wouldn't enable you to publish a web server but would allow you to
access
your own kit!
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Lidstone [mailto:patrick@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 17 November 2000 12:57
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: ISDN vs ADSL
> Also see this for what looks like a more professional approach. I
> haven't tried it, but it looks feature rich and supported. Allows
port 80
> to be mapped to any port at your end!
Don't get too excited - it won't help if they're preventing incoming
connections by filtering syn packets...
Patrick
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9699/3/_/2065/_/974468324/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|