RE: RE: (ukha_d) (OT) - Fuji Finepix 6900

["Brian G. Reynolds" <brian.g.reynolds@xxxxxxx>]

What sort of price are you talking about for one of these?

I still own a 18 year old OM10!

B.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Laurence [mailto:andylaurence@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 03 December 2001 20:16
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] RE: (ukha_d) (OT) - Fuji Finepix 6900


> I've got the 4700 (its predecessor) and think it's great.  With smart
media
> cards now dirt cheap I take everything in maximum resolution and the
piccies
> print off great.  I've had a couple enlarged to 18" x 12"
(ish) and I
still
> can't see the difference between the digital and the SLR, apart from a
slight
> loss of depth.  I like sunset piccies, and it's good at these (ie
quite
low
> light), plus I can discard the crappy ones, thus not annoying SWMBO
who
doesn't
> share my fetish for sunsets!

The 4700 was replaced by the 4800, which is the lower model of the 6800
(4.3Mpixel vs 6Mpixel).  The 6900 is an SLR style camera with 6x optical
zoom, and the CCD from the 6800.  It is a higher pixel count version of the
4900.  I've heard great reviews about this camera, and the above
observations are not obsolete, as the cameras are technically similar (AFAI
am aware).  I shall be purchasing a 4900 as my next camera after a
photographer friend recommended it (I don't require or want 6Mpixel).

Andy
--
PC-Based Multimedia System
http://www.andylaurence.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/pcbmms

_________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/