[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ukha_d) (OT) - Fuji Finepix 6900
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: (ukha_d) (OT) - Fuji Finepix 6900
- From: peter.white@xxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 19:57:38 +0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I've got the 4700 (its predecessor) and think it's great. With smart media
cards now dirt cheap I take everything in maximum resolution and the
piccies
print off great. I've had a couple enlarged to 18" x 12" (ish)
and I still
can't see the difference between the digital and the SLR, apart from a
slight
loss of depth. I like sunset piccies, and it's good at these (ie quite low
light), plus I can discard the crappy ones, thus not annoying SWMBO who
doesn't
share my fetish for sunsets!
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: MIME:john.mcmanus@xxxxxxx at INTERNET
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 04:56
To: White, Peter; ukha_d@xxxxxxx at Internet
Subject: [ukha_d] [OT] - Fuji Finepix 6900
I know quite a few people on list have various digital cameras... with
arrival of offspring #2, I am about to make a digicam purchase.
I have looked at quite a few reviews and I am considering going down the
Fuji
6900 route... it has a few issues in terms of focusing at low light levels,
but seems to have a reasonable set of features.
The need to purchase has come up rather sooner than expected, so I have not
had the time to fully investigate the topic.
Opinions on the model chosen or reasons why you chose to purchase your
particular camera would be appreciated.
Thanks - John
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|