Re: Firecracker and USB-Serial

["Josepi" <JRM.@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Obviously we both understand what is happenning. MY RS-232 connections
always work. If they don't I permanently adapt them to the standard.

Attempting to increase the bandwidth of the argument is probably only
trolling and fruitless. I didn't see your base disclaimer and you didn't see
mine. The importance is insignificant at this point.

All the best.


"Bill Fuhrmann" <ReplyToGroup> wrote in message
news:rpmdnbCZAYgiJCDRnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
No reading comprehension problems.  I addressed that the standard is
insignificant because it is violated to such an extent that it is useless.

Saying "Just buy the apropriate (sic) cables and if they plug in they work."
without qualifying it that this is in case the vendor just happens to follow
the official standard, when you know that they don't is a load of crap.

I suppose that you would also be willing to say "following the speed limit
means you won't get passed."


"Josepi" <JRM.@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hf0vo.2643$jw4.1233@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Reading comprehension problems?
>
> You had problems because the equipment manufacturers don't stick to the
> defined IEEE standard.
>
> Your "guru" status may have been misplaced or self acclaimed.
>
> I have been there also and it is a mess. Now they are doing it with
> Ethernet
> and USB.
>
>
> "Bill Fuhrmann" <ReplyToGroup> wrote in message
> news:w6qdnRvOF5sR2CHRnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Josepi" <JRM.@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ...
>> Just buy the apropriate cables and if they plug in they work. All the
>> confusion was created by those not understanding that the IEEE EIA-232
>> was
>> defined within an inch of it's life. No hammers for the connections
>> though.
>>
>> Next we can get into signal lines that everybody wanted to violate...LOL
>> It
>> gets complicated by, again, **sigh** the companies that wanted to break
>> out
>> on their own.
>
> What a load-O-$^&%
>
> I spent a number of years working on combining many instruments from many
> makers into automated test systems and was the defacto company interface
> guru.
>
> When something says it is an RS-232 serial port, that is just a hint to
> starting the connection issues.  The IBM PC serial cards really helped
> straighten out the mess because many companies decided that it was the
> most
> common and well documented version.  There is still a lot of equipment
> that
> swap the lines or only use odd combinations or none of the handshaking
> lines.  Many also use improper voltages even though the chips to add the
> proper voltages are cheap.
>
>
>