Re: Anyone moved to LED Lighting?

["Josepi" <JRM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You base your whole argument and insults on the back of some vehicle parked
at the back of your scrap yard? Show me the money.

At least if you are going to use over 2348  (your figures) different nyms
you should attempt to change your stupid insult style of words. It would
make trolling and stalking much more effective for you.

 **sigh** The newbies.

You can run but you can never hide. Better luck next time.

<salty@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:h05gg5tbv60uolhick0rlrpqliu22ch579@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:35:31 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>LED tail light are not "very bright". The illumination is very poor.
>>
>
> Once again, you are COMPLETELY wrong. The only thing in this
> conversation that is not very bright, is you.
>
>>However LED lights are very focused and play on the human vision system to
>>compete with the effectiveness of incandescents.
>>
>>Many incandescent tail lights have taken a lesson in efficiency also and
>>many of the so-called LED taillights on vehicles are actually incandescent
>>bulbs. Take a closer look and you will see many peanut bulbs in a
>>reflector
>>with small pockets.
>>
>
> Once again, you are COMPLETELY wrong. Just so I could say I knew for
> certain, I just went out and looked again. LED's, dopey. Nine in each
> tail/brakelight. Looked in the manual and in the list of replacement
> bulbs, there is nothing listed for tail lights. They are not expected
> to need replacement in the lifetime of the vehicle. If they are
> damaged in an accident, you replace the whole light array as an
> assembly.
>
> Game, Set, Match
>
>>When will we see back-up LED lights on vehicles?  Not likely in the near
>>future. The total luminence is not there to illuminate an area. Something
>>LEDs have failed at, to date.
>>
>
> Once again, you are COMPLETELY wrong. Have someone (who can read) look
> up the word "array" in a dictionary and explain it to you.
>
>