Re: Anyone moved to LED Lighting?

["Josepi" <JRM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Isn't it time for the troll to change his nick again?

You been using this one for a long...long time now. Almost.... 21 posts?
Some kind of record for you, no?

BTW: Your interlaced posting mixed in with other styles makes you almost
unintelligeible. That and your amazing math skills makes you almost a bozo
bin candidate.

Stick to the oar myth, it seems more plausible, in this group, anyway.


<salty@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dn9fi5t2u0jleomirlmo7g9gkvivd879of@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:57:39 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>When will you be coming over to install another pot light then?
>>
>
> I'm not interested in the job. Mostly because if you offer me $150,
> your deficient math skills will result in a check for $100. You will
> of course, insist that it is really $150.
>
>
>><salty@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:67sei5pbtn3und1sgbkerpvsrpinej4g3o@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:31:57 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>And increased the number of corrective lenses by 150%
>>>>
>>>>I had a few of these LED PAR30 bulbs in my hand a week ago. The prices
>>>>were
>>>>outrageous and the lumen output was so pathetic I would have to install
>>>>triple the fixtures to be able to watch TV with them on.
>>>>IIRC the largest was 11 Watts and put out about 530 lumens??? Compare
>>>>this
>>>>to a 23 Watt CFL (Not PAR30) putting out 1200 lumens.
>>>>
>>>
>>> 11 watts gives 530 lumens versus 23 watts gives 1200? Do the math,
>>> dopey. Sounds like DOUBLE the fixtures would give you 22 watts and
>>> 1060 lumens with the particular LED's you are whining about.
>>>
>>