Re: Anyone moved to LED Lighting?

[The Daring Dufas <the-daring-dufas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Don Klipstein wrote:
> In article <hh0l7g$blh$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, The Daring Dufas wrote:
>> Nate Nagel wrote:
>>> Josepi wrote:
>>>> Get some real lights on that boat and a decent news browser so you can
>>>> understand what you are reading.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL
>>>>
>>>> <salty@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>>> news:tn07j5dshv3f6h5k30ojclou88aehjnn9n@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> PLONK for unremitting idiocy
>>> Oh, and if you *insist* on using Outhouse Express, at least configure it
>>> properly.  And it's a "mail client" acting as a "newsreader" not a
>>> "browser," you fuckwit.
>>>
>>> http://mailformat.dan.info/config/oex.html
>> I see the guy recommends "QuoteFix" which is what I used years ago
>> when I had Outlook Express as my newsreader. I don't understand
>> why so many people are resistant to bottom posting and following
>> Usenet conventions. Some folks  are just contrary.
>>
>> TDD
>
>   What - Outlook fails to follow quoting convention, while the email/news
> software in the Netscape 4.7 package does?  (Not that I post much with
> that either...)
>
>   I did not know that since I never use Outlook for anything.  For one
> thing, I have heard half a bazillion complaints over most of the past
> several years how it is more vulnerable to e-mail viruses than what I use
> for e-mail, including the mail/news software in Netscape 4.7 and webmail
> services and the mail software in my Unix shell account, or even Eudora.
>
>   If Outlook also fails to add quotation symbols in material being
> responded to, then I agree with calling it Outhouse!
>
>  - Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)

I've been using Thunderbird as a newsreader for a while now and it
does everything I want it to do. I don't use it for Email because
all my Email accounts are web based, like G-mail, Hotmail, etc.

TDD