Re: Anyone moved to LED Lighting?

["Josepi" <JRM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It was actually a trick sentence without the word "minimum" found anywhere.

When you are a cheap troll, you need to bend the context and meaning of
sentences a lot to make your argument seem valid. Sometimes people reach
down into the facts, for a troll, and come up empty handed and have to, just
plain, make up shit.


"Charles Sullivan" <cwsulliv@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:JDNVm.8$eH1.2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:23:23 -0500, salty wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:31:57 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>And increased the number of corrective lenses by 150%
>>>
>>>I had a few of these LED PAR30 bulbs in my hand a week ago. The prices
>>>were outrageous and the lumen output was so pathetic I would have to
>>>install triple the fixtures to be able to watch TV with them on. IIRC
>>>the largest was 11 Watts and put out about 530 lumens??? Compare this to
>>>a 23 Watt CFL (Not PAR30) putting out 1200 lumens.
>>>
>>>
>> 11 watts gives 530 lumens versus 23 watts gives 1200? Do the math,
>> dopey. Sounds like DOUBLE the fixtures would give you 22 watts and 1060
>> lumens with the particular LED's you are whining about.
>
> Just how do your extraordinary skills with higher mathematics show that
> double the fixtures provide enough light if he thinks he needs a minimum
> of 1200 lumens?
>