Re: Anyone moved to LED Lighting?

["Josepi" <JRM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

It does become hard to differentiate sales promotion at the cost of other
product bashing from honest testing and reporting, whatever that is...LOL

I believe it was that same report that brought in LED lighting as a similiar
problem as fluorescent spectrums. I wouldn't have believed that lighting
spectrum balance was so important but as I age I find myself very affected
by lighting, particularly SADS type responses due to lack of sunlight.


"Don Klipstein" <don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrnhj2nr6.gq4.don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In article <uK7Ym.5537$2A7.695@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Josepi wrote:
  The whole document appears to me to be a fluorescent-bashing BS set of
half-truths.

  In fact, most health claims related to 460 nm from advocates of
full-spectrum lamps are that non-full-spectrum fluorescents do not produce
enough in the 460 nm area (which most white LEDs do produce a lot of).

  As it turns out, CFLs do not produce a lot of ultraviolet, in fact
much less than is present in an equivalent amount of daylight that has
passed through a glass window.  CFLs produce more UV than incandescents
do, but still little.

 - Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)