Re: Anyone moved to LED Lighting?

[don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Don Klipstein)]

In article <QD8Wm.49950$ZF3.10152@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Josepi wrote:

>Thanx for the link but, it becomes very obvious that decent lighting is not
>a requirement for you, as you post.
>
>Perhaps you could turn up the brightness on your LED backlit monitor, or put
>on your spectacles and read the posts before posting unrelated links. Even
>if the outdoor bulb did fit the fixture above my sink the somewhere between
>390 and 450 lumens at somewhere between 2600K to 8000K colour temp.

  Someone please point out to me a complete part number including
notation of customer-selectable binning / ranking of any LED lighting
product or for that matter any LED with color temperature tolerance range
of 2600 to 8000 K.  Preferably for something not also available in
versions with much narrow color temperature tolerance ranges.

> and low
>lux output would not fit the bill. I like to see what I am doing.
>
>Let's face it. LED area lighting has not become a reality for humans, yet.
>ESL technology may be the next answer for a few decades.

  What the heck is ESL?

  Meanwhile, it appears to me that LED units comparable in color,
efficiency and CRI to CFLs and lasting 2-5 times as long will be on home
center shelves in a couple years.  There are LED pot light fixtures with
CFL-like efficiency, incandescent-like color and CRI of 92 and that have
been on the market (not mass-market retail in my experience however) for
something like a year already, though likely expensive.

<snip mostly previously quoted material>

 - Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)