[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Long Live the Incandescent!

Subject: Re: Long Live the Incandescent!
From: "B Fuhrmann" <b-fuhrmann-usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:13:41 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation, alt.home.automation
References: <4a51dc87.7147500@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2533efd9-3379-43e9-9b71-d55b66efb15c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4a553bcc.55344406@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2r3f55ln06csh49o70ea44r0nuii4tfm27@xxxxxxx> <psadnb2KkKxf68HXnZ2dnUVZ_rGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <h3i3ag$88q$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4a5da4e7.22601968@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f_mdnSrJp6wzpsDXnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Robert L Bass"  wrote :
> The obvious thing is that we need to address energy consumption on all
> fronts -- not just a few "big targets."  By dragging feet on everything
> but the most difficult areas to improve, we further delay doing anything
> at all --  while things continue to get worse.

However, the bulk of the effort (and cost) should be to those things that
give more reward and are feasible.

Another way of saying it is EFFECT / COST -> PRIORITY

--
Bill Fuhrmann

Next by Message: Re: PC solution like Crestron
Previous by thread: Re: PC solution like Crestron
Next by thread: Re: current state of protocols; x10? what else?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home