Re: CFL database

[nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)]

Since I keep him in my killfile, I only see a sampling of the fishy
Floridian's daily litany of lies when someone quotes him. One thing I know
for sure is that bass are completely incapable of telling the truth.

While this company may be biased, they say that fluorescents are the biggest
source of mercury contamination of any consumer product.

     http://www.bethlehemlamprecycling.com/page01.htm

"Lon" <Lonnie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>"Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:i8_ej.16169$DG4.259@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> "Dave Houston" wrote:
>>>
>>> Switching from incandescents to CFLs means a net increase in mercury.
>>
>> That is patently untrue and I believe Dave knows it by now.
>
>Odd, that is not what the Gore groupies are saying around here.
>
>California effectively mandated CFLs and FLs in 2005 for new homes,
>mandating that screw type fixtures not be installed.  (Title 24).   That
>will mean a net increase in mercury in landfills until there are provisions
>for separate disposal of dead FL and CFL bulbs.
>
>Good overview here:  http://www.ccidc.org/pdf/2005%20Res%20Lighting2.pdf


http://davehouston.net  http://davehouston.org
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/roZetta/
roZetta-subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx