[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why deliberately shorting equipment to blow breakers might be a bad idea . . .

Subject: Re: Why deliberately shorting equipment to blow breakers might be a bad idea . . .
From: "z" <gzuckier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 17 Jan 2007 10:45:58 -0800
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation, alt.home.repair
References: <HuKdnVSJx5hwuTrYnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d@xxxxxxx> <bunfq29afpntmi9cpqtn50n7p5ajf45hvc@xxxxxxx>

Tom The Great wrote:
> Good info.  I was always told, never intentially create a makeshift
> fault to test a protective device, because it might only be designed
> to work once, or it might fail badly, and never work right ever again.

No wonder my fuse-tester isn't working right!

References:
- Why deliberately shorting equipment to blow breakers might be a bad idea . . .
  - From: Robert Green
- Re: Why deliberately shorting equipment to blow breakers might be a bad idea . . .
  - From: Tom The Great

Prev by Message: Dish Network Receiver Device Codes
Next by Message: Re: Dish Network Receiver Device Codes
Previous by thread: Re: Why deliberately shorting equipment to blow breakers might be a bad idea . . .
Next by thread: Re: Why deliberately shorting equipment to blow breakers might be a bad idea . . .
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home